ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2023
Transpalpebral intraocular pressure measurement by Diaton compared to Goldman applanation tonometer in myopic eyes before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in Saudi Arabia.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Goldman applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer and trans-palpebral tonometer.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Agreement and repeatability of a novel portable transpalpebral tonometer for home tonometry versus non-contact and rebound tonometry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured
methodsThis cross-sectional validation study was held in 2020 in an eye hospital in Saudi Arabia. IOP was measured by Diaton and GAT before treatment, after one week, and one month of TPRK. It is considered if IOP difference by Diaton and GAT was less than ±2 mm Hg acceptable. The IOP difference was tested if correlated to spherical equivalent (SE), central corneal thickness (CCT), age, gender, or tpIOP.
resultsTotolly 200 myopic eyes of 100 patients were included in the study. The mean difference of IOP measured by two methods before TPRK, 1wk, and 1mo after TPRK were 0.790, -0.790, and -0.920 mm Hg, respectively (
conclusionDiaton is a good screening tool for IOP before TPRK. It helps in monitoring IOP after surgery. Although more practical, it is less efficient than GAT. In eyes with high myopia and low tpIOP before surgery, IOP post-TPRK by Diaton and GAT could differ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.