Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935656›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Represent: A community engagement roadmap to improve participant representation in cancer early detection research: An Oregon case study.

Jessica Currier, Ignacia Arteaga, Hannah Turner-Uaandja, Bella Starling, Nora Pashayan, Christina Jäderholm, Christopher Ponce Campuzano, Jackilen Shannon

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica CurrierDivision of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Ignacia ArteagaUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hannah Turner-UaandjaVocal, Research & Innovation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, in Partnership With University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Bella StarlingVocal, Research & Innovation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, in Partnership With University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Nora PashayanDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christina JäderholmOregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Christopher Ponce CampuzanoSchool of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Jackilen ShannonDivision of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Oregon Health & Science University · USManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While authentic and sustained community involvement in the research process is critically important to making new technologies and interventions effective and socially acceptable, there is uneven participation across sociodemographic, racial, and ethnic communities in many research areas, including cancer early detection research. Currently, 18% of cancer in the United States impacts Hispanics and Latinos, this population accounts for < 10% of research participants. Understanding barriers and facilitators to cancer early detection research is imperative to the ultimate success of this research. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: understand Hispanic and Latino community perspectives in participation in cancer early detection research; and identify sustainable and mutually beneficial approaches to community engagement and involvement. Methods: The Oregon Case Study, led by Oregon Health & Science University's Community Outreach, Research and Engagement (CORE) in partnership with colleagues at Vocal, a partnership between Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester and Cambridge University, adopted a participatory research approach to better understand participation in cancer early detection research from the perspectives of Oregon's Hispanic and Latino community members. We implemented two evidence-based community engagement models, the Community Engagement Studio and the Community Readiness Assessment Model. Using a facilitated format prescribed by each community engagement model, community members helped us to answer two research questions: (1) What methods help us increase participation of underrepresented communities in cancer early detection research?; and (2) How can we build trust between researchers and underrepresented communities within cancer early detection research? Quantitative (i.e., descriptive statistic) and qualitative (i.e., thematic analysis) analytic methods were used to measure and assess community knowledge, leadership, beliefs, and resources regarding participation in cancer early detection research. Results: A total of 36 Hispanic and Latino community members participated in the two community engagement models. We identified three emergent themes pertaining to participation in cancer early detection research that include: low-level awareness of cancer early detection research and opportunities for research participation, structural barriers to research participation, and uncertainty of the benefits of research participation. Conclusion: Our approach, using two evidence-based community engagement models, yielded valuable insights about perceptions of research participation for Hispanic and Latino community members. These findings, synthesized into three key themes, led to actionable recommendations to increase research participation.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsCommunity ParticipationHispanic or LatinoHumansOregonUnited Statescancer early detectioncancer early detection researchcommunity engagementresearch participationunderserved and unserved populations

Identifiers

PMID36935656
PMCPMC10020373
OpenAlexW4323045081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read17
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.