Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36935432›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor and Its Prognostic Impact: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 195 Cases with Radical Resection.

Yukiharu Hiyoshi, Nobuya Daitoku, Toshiki Mukai, Toshiya Nagasaki, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Takashi Akiyoshi, Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Shoichi Saito, Manabu Takamatsu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yukiharu HiyoshiGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan. yukiharu.hiyoshi@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9209-554X
Nobuya DaitokuGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiki MukaiGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiya NagasakiGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro YamaguchiGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi AkiyoshiGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Chihiro YasueGastroenterological Center, Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko ChinoGastroenterological Center, Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoichi SaitoGastroenterological Center, Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Manabu TakamatsuDepartment of Pathology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke FukunagaGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
The Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been steadily increasing. The risk factors for and prognostic impact of lymph node (LN) metastasis were analyzed in 195 patients with stage I-III rectal NET who underwent radical surgery.

methodsThis retrospective, single-center study analyzed risk factors for LN metastasis focusing on previously identified factors and a novel risk factor: multiple rectal NETs. The association between LN metastasis and the prognosis was also analyzed.

resultsPathologically, the LN metastasis rate (also the rate of stage III disease) was 39%, which was higher than the clinical LN metastasis rate of 14%. Tumor size > 10 mm, presence of central depression, tumor grade G2, depth of invasion, LN swelling on preoperative imaging (cN1), venous invasion and multiple NETs were identified as risk factors for LN metastasis. As the tumor size and risk factors increased, the rate of LN metastasis increased. Among these 7 factors, venous invasion, cN1, and multiple NETs were identified as independent predictors of LN metastasis. LN metastasis of rectal NETs was associated with significantly poor disease-free and disease-specific survival.

conclusionsAs risk factors increase, the potential for rectal NETs to metastasize to the LNs increases and LN metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis. This is the first study to report multiple NETs as a risk factor for LN metastasis. A future study examining the survival benefit of radical surgery accompanying LN dissection compared with local resection is warranted.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsRectal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID36935432
OpenAlexW4327860783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.