Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36934457›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2023

Virtual Resection Specimen Interaction Using Augmented Reality Holograms to Guide Margin Communication and Flap Sizing.

Fabian N Necker, Marcello Chang, Christoph Leuze, Michael C Topf, Bruce L Daniel, Fred M Baik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Augmented Reality-based Guidance with Deformable Registration in Head and Neck Tumor Resection.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabian N NeckerDepartment of Radiology, Incubator for Medical Mixed Reality at Stanford (IMMERS), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4044-4330
Marcello ChangDepartment of Radiology, Incubator for Medical Mixed Reality at Stanford (IMMERS), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0687-0683
Christoph LeuzeDepartment of Radiology, Incubator for Medical Mixed Reality at Stanford (IMMERS), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Michael C TopfDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Bruce L DanielDepartment of Radiology, Incubator for Medical Mixed Reality at Stanford (IMMERS), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0475-5892
Fred M BaikDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck surgeons often have difficulty in relocating sites of positive margins due to the complex 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy of the head and neck. We introduce a new technique where resection specimens are 3D scanned with a smartphone, annotated in computer-assisted design software, and immediately visualized on augmented reality (AR) glasses. The 3D virtual specimen can be accurately superimposed onto surgical sites for orientation and sizing applications. During an operative workshop, a surgeon using AR glasses projected virtual, annotated specimen models back into the resection bed onto a cadaver within approximately 10 minutes. Colored annotations can correspond with pathologic annotations and guide the orientation of the virtual 3D specimen. The model was also overlayed onto a flap harvest site to aid in reconstructive planning. We present a new technique allowing interactive, sterile inspection of tissue specimens in AR that could facilitate communication among surgeons and pathologists and assist with reconstructive surgery.

Indexed as

Augmented RealitySurgery, Computer-AssistedHeadHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalSoftware3D scanningaugmented realitycomputer-aided surgerycomputer-guided surgical planningdigital anatomydigital pathologyhead-neck cancerhead-neck surgeryHoloLensmicrovascular reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID36934457
PMCPMC13179541
OpenAlexW4327846152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.