Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36934452›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

A prospective study of psychological distress among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

Irene Teo, Sean Ng, Filipinas Gines Bundoc, Chetna Malhotra, Semra Ozdemir, Jennifer L Steel, Eric A Finkelstein, COMPASS Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. From Willingness to Readiness: Caregiver Activation for Cancer Care in Singapore.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene TeoLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1720-4718
Sean NgLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Filipinas Gines BundocLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Chetna MalhotraLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5380-0525
Semra OzdemirLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7556-1601
Jennifer L SteelDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric A FinkelsteinLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
COMPASS Group
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer can impact the psychological well-being of both patients and their informal caregivers. We investigated the joint trajectories of psychological distress among Singaporean advanced cancer patients-caregiver dyads. We also examined predictors of trajectory group membership.

methodsThis study utilised data from 299 patients with advanced solid cancer and their caregivers over 33 months (12 times points). Group-based trajectory modelling was used to examine the joint trajectories of patient anxiety, patient depression, caregiver anxiety and caregiver depression scores using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

resultsFour joint trajectory groups were found: (1) Patient-caregiver low distress (27%), (2) patient-caregiver increasing distress (28.5%), (3) patient low- caregiver borderline distress (25%), (4) patient-caregiver high distress (19.5%). Dyads where the patient is below 50 years of age were more likely to be in Group 4. Dyads where caregiver-patient emotional closeness was low were more likely to be in Groups 2 or 4 where dyads reported increasing/high distress. Dyads that reported financial inadequacy were more likely to be in Groups 2, 3 and 4, while dyads with caregivers who were employed were more likely to be in group 3.

conclusionsA substantial proportion of patients and caregivers reported anxiety and/or depression that lasted or increased throughout the study duration. We found significant heterogeneity in how dyads experienced psychological distress, suggesting that efforts should consider dyadic differences when providing psychological support. Particular focus should be placed on identifying dyads that are at risk and who require additional support.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPsychological DistressAnxietyCaregiversDepressionHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeStress, Psychologicalclinical cancer researchepidemiologypsychosocial studiesquality of life

Identifiers

PMID36934452
PMCPMC10166955
OpenAlexW4327846159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.