Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36934434›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2023

A systematic review of neoadjuvant and definitive immunotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Udit Nindra, Joshua Hurwitz, Dion Forstner, Venessa Chin, Richard Gallagher, Jia Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prediction of Oral Cancer Biomarkers by Salivary Proteomics Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Udit NindraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2612-9502
Joshua HurwitzThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Dion ForstnerThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Venessa ChinThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Richard GallagherThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Jia LiuThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) require multi-modality treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in management of recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. However, its role in the definitive and neoadjuvant setting remains unclear.

methodsA literature search was conducted that included all articles investigating ICI in untreated locally advanced (LA) HNSCC. Data was extracted and summarised and rated for quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

resultsOf 1086 records, 29 met the final inclusion criteria. In both concurrent and neoadjuvant settings, the addition of ICI was safe and did not delay surgery or reduce chemoradiotherapy completion. In the concurrent setting, although ICI use demonstrates objective responses in all published trials, there has not yet been published data to with PFS or OS benefit. In the neoadjuvant setting, combination ICI resulted in superior major pathological response rates compared to ICI monotherapy without a significant increase adverse event profiles, but its value in improving survival is not clear. ICI efficacy appears to be affected by tumour characteristics, in particular PD-L1 combined positive score, HPV status and the tumour microenvironment.

conclusionsThere is significant heterogeneity of ICI use in untreated LA HNSCC with multiple definitive concurrent and neoadjuvant protocols used. Resultantly, conclusions regarding the survival benefits of adding ICI to standard-of-care regimens cannot be made. Further trials and translational studies are required to elucidate optimal ICI sequencing in the definitive setting as well as better define populations more suited for neoadjuvant protocols.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTumor Microenvironmentcurativedefinitive immunoradiotherapyhead and neck cancerimmunotherapyneoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36934434
PMCPMC10242857
OpenAlexW4327846083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.