Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36934432›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2023

Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Cochlear Implantation.

Daniel M Zeitler, Camille Dunn, Seth R Schwartz, Jennifer L McCoy, Carmen Jamis, David H Chi, Donald M Goldberg, Samantha Anne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Longitudinal Cochlear Implant Use in Pediatric Patients With Unilateral Hearing Loss.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Rational Design of Inner Ear Drug Delivery Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M ZeitlerVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Camille DunnUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Seth R SchwartzVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jennifer L McCoyChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Carmen JamisCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
David H ChiChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Donald M GoldbergCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Samantha AnneCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Inyong Choi · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) benefits with cochlear implantation (CI) in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL) versus bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BSNHL). STUDY

designA cross-sectional survey of parents of children who underwent CI for USNHL and BSNHL.

settingTertiary care academic centers.

methodsThe "Children with cochlear implants: parental perspectives" survey was administered. Parents rated responses on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores greater than 3.0 were considered favorable. Responses were recorded within 8 domains and groups were compared with respect to domain scores. Analysis of covariance models was used to compare groups while adjusting for age at implantation and duration of implant use.

resultsThere were 31 patients with USNHL and 27 patients with BSNHL. The average age of implantation in BSNHL patients was 1.9 and 6.7 years for USNHL. Parents of all children answered favorably in all domains. When adjusted for age at implantation and duration of implant use, parents of BSNHL children responded significantly more favorably only in 2 domains. When comparing patients with older age or prolonged duration of hearing loss in the USNHL cohort, there were favorable responses in all domains with no significant differences between groups.

conclusionThere are HR-QOL benefits of CI in USNHL children; less pronounced favorable results were noted only in 2 domains when compared to BSNHL children. Benefits were noted with CI in USNHL children at an older age at implantation or prolonged duration of hearing loss. Therefore, these factors should not be absolute contraindications for CI in USNHL.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationDeafnessHearing LossHearing Loss, SensorineuralChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHearing Loss, BilateralHumansInfantQuality of Lifecochlear implanthearing losspediatricquality of lifesingle-sided deafness

Identifiers

PMID36934432
PMCPMC10213080
OpenAlexW4327846160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.