Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36934294›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Enhancing the scalability of Wolbachia-based vector-borne disease management: time and temperature limits for storage and transport of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti eggs for field releases.

Megan J Allman, Ya-Hsun Lin, D Albert Joubert, Jessica Addley-Cook, Maria Camila Mejía-Torres, Cameron P Simmons, Heather A Flores, Johanna E Fraser

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New microbes and new infections · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Dengue Exposure andViruses · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan J AllmanInstitute of Vector-borne Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Ya-Hsun LinWorld Mosquito Program, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
D Albert JoubertWorld Mosquito Program, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Jessica Addley-CookWorld Mosquito Program, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Maria Camila Mejía-TorresWorld Mosquito Program, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Cameron P SimmonsInstitute of Vector-borne Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Heather A FloresInstitute of Vector-borne Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia. heather.flores@monash.edu.
Johanna E FraserInstitute of Vector-borne Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia. johanna.fraser@monash.edu.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrogression of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia into Aedes aegypti populations is a biocontrol approach being used to reduce arbovirus transmission. This requires mass release of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes. While releases have been conducted using a variety of techniques, egg releases, using water-soluble capsules containing mosquito eggs and larval food, offer an attractive method due to its potential to reduce onsite resource requirements. However, optimisation of this approach is required to ensure there is no detrimental impact on mosquito fitness and to promote successful Wolbachia introgression.

methodsWe determined the impact of storage time and temperature on wild-type (WT) and Wolbachia-infected (wMel or wAlbB strains) Ae. aegypti eggs. Eggs were stored inside capsules over 8 weeks at 18 °C or 22 °C and hatch rate, emergence rate and Wolbachia density were determined. We next examined egg quality and Wolbachia density after exposing eggs to 4-40 °C to determine how eggs may be impacted if exposed to extreme temperatures during shipment.

resultsEncapsulating eggs for 8 weeks did not negatively impact egg viability or resulting adult emergence and Wolbachia density compared to controls. When eggs were exposed to temperatures within 4-36 °C for 48 h, their viability and resulting adult Wolbachia density were maintained; however, both were significantly reduced when exposed to 40 °C.

conclusionsWe describe the time and temperature limits for maintaining viability of Wolbachia-infected Ae. aegypti eggs when encapsulated or exposed to extreme temperatures. These findings could improve the efficiency of mass releases by providing transport and storage constraints to ensure only high-quality material is utilised during field releases.

Indexed as

AedesWolbachiaAnimalsEggsMosquito VectorsTemperatureAedes aegyptiBiocontrolCapsuleEgg releaseEndosymbiontInsect releasesWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID36934294
PMCPMC10024388
OpenAlexW4327814371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read126
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.