Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36934211›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2023

Development and implementation of a decision aid for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction for Japanese women with breast cancer: a field-testing study.

Yoshihiro Sowa, Naoki Inafuku, Itaru Tsuge, Hiroki Yamanaka, Motoki Katsube, Michiharu Sakamoto, Ichiro Nakayama, Naoki Morimoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yoshihiro SowaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. ysowawan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-1630
Naoki InafukuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Itaru TsugeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroki YamanakaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Motoki KatsubeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Michiharu SakamotoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ichiro NakayamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Kyoto Miniren Chuo Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki MorimotoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical options for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) have increased and become more diverse. These options may cause difficulty and stress for patients in making the best choice, and this also increases the likelihood of postoperative regret over a particular decision. To solve this issue, implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) using a decision aid (DA) has become of increasing interest. We have created the first prototype DA in Japan. The aim of the current field study was to assess the usability of this DA in promoting effective SDM and avoiding regret over a decision to undergo reconstructive surgery.

methodsA total of 25 consecutive patients who underwent BR were enrolled in the study, including 13 with SDM using the decision aid (DA + group) and 12 who received standard information (DA- group) before their choice of surgery. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) were completed after PMBR, whereas SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) was completed before PMBR. Descriptive and summary statistics were compared to identify differences between the two groups to assess the usability of the DA.

resultsThe DA + group had significantly higher mean total scores on the SDM-Q-9 (90.2 ± 5.3 vs. 84.1 ± 3.5, P = 0.0034) and DRS (90.3 ± 3.8 vs. 84.3 ± 6.7, P = 0.023), compared to those in the DA- group.

conclusionUse of the DA may cause patients to have a higher level of perceived SDM and less regret, which suggests that the DA helps to facilitate smooth and effective implementation of SDM. We conclude that this type of decision-making approach should be recommended for choice of surgery for PMBR.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMastectomyDecision aidDecision-makingPost-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR)QuestionnaireShared decision-making

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.