ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023
A scoping review of portable sensing for out-of-lab anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention and rehabilitation.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and wearable sensors in sports injury risk prediction: current status and future perspectives.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- "It's a black box": Physiotherapists' perspectives on sensorimotor control and the use of technology in this context to improve rehabilitation following ACL injury.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Sports Trauma: From Prevention to Surgery and Return to Sport.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GaitDynamics: a generative foundation model for analyzing human walking and running.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Advances in Gait Alterations and Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Biomechanics and Emerging Technologies.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Review
- Machine and deep learning models for ligament injury recognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging and novel diagnostic techniques.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- The COMPWALK-ACL: A Dataset of Multi-pace IMU Gait Kinematics in Adolescents, Adults, and ACL Injured Patients.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Biologic Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Beyond: A Review of PRP and BMAC.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Wearable Devices for the Quantitative Assessment of Knee Joint Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury or Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantification of 3D Kinematic Measurements for Knee Flexion and Tibial Rotation Using an IMU-Based Sensor and Ultrasound Imaging System: A Cadaveric Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Self-Supervised Learning Improves Accuracy and Data Efficiency for IMU-Based Ground Reaction Force Estimation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
- Self-Supervised Learning Improves Accuracy and Data Efficiency for IMU-Based Ground Reaction Force Estimation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Estimating 3D kinematics and kinetics from virtual inertial sensor data through musculoskeletal movement simulations.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery are common. Laboratory-based biomechanical assessment can evaluate ACL injury risk and rehabilitation progress after ACLR; however, lab-based measurements are expensive and inaccessible to most people. Portable sensors such as wearables and cameras can be deployed during sporting activities, in clinics, and in patient homes. Although many portable sensing approaches have demonstrated promising results during various assessments related to ACL injury, they have not yet been widely adopted as tools for out-of-lab assessment. The purpose of this review is to summarize research on out-of-lab portable sensing applied to ACL and ACLR and offer our perspectives on new opportunities for future research and development. We identified 49 original research articles on out-of-lab ACL-related assessment; the most common sensing modalities were inertial measurement units, depth cameras, and RGB cameras. The studies combined portable sensors with direct feature extraction, physics-based modeling, or machine learning to estimate a range of biomechanical parameters (e.g., knee kinematics and kinetics) during jump-landing tasks, cutting, squats, and gait. Many of the reviewed studies depict proof-of-concept methods for potential future clinical applications including ACL injury risk screening, injury prevention training, and rehabilitation assessment. By synthesizing these results, we describe important opportunities that exist for clinical validation of existing approaches, using sophisticated modeling techniques, standardization of data collection, and creation of large benchmark datasets. If successful, these advances will enable widespread use of portable-sensing approaches to identify ACL injury risk factors, mitigate high-risk movements prior to injury, and optimize rehabilitation paradigms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.