ArticleScientific reports2023
Deep learning pose estimation for multi-cattle lameness detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hooves, Sensors, and Signals: Precision Approaches to Automated Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Video-Based Detection of Dairy Cow Hoof-Slipping Behaviour Using Improved DeepLabCut and NeuFlow v2.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Computer Vision for Cattle Health and Welfare Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Interdisciplinary Integration in Smart Agriculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-Driven Multimodal Sensing for Early Detection of Health Disorders in Dairy Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Direct video-based spatiotemporal deep learning for cattle lameness detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Video-Based Automated Lameness Detection for Dairy Cows.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Computer Vision in Dairy Farm Management: A Literature Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Accuracy of Detecting Degrees of Lameness in Individual Dairy Cattle Within a Herd Using Single and Multiple Changes in Behavior and Gait.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Lameness detection in dairy cows from overhead view: high-precision keypoint localization and multi-feature fusion classification.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Lameness Recognition of Dairy Cows Based on Compensation Behaviour Analysis by Swing and Posture Features from Top View Depth Image.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Development of a real-time cattle lameness detection system using a single side-view camera.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Cow Welfare Monitoring: A Novel Top-View Perspective with Depth Camera-Based Lameness Classification.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a fully automated multiple-cow real-time lameness detection system using a deep learning approach for cattle detection and pose estimation that could be deployed across dairy farms. Utilising computer vision and deep learning, the system can analyse simultaneously both the posture and gait of each cow within a camera field of view to a very high degree of accuracy (94-100%). Twenty-five video sequences containing 250 cows in varying degrees of lameness were recorded and independently scored by three accredited Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) mobility scorers using the AHDB dairy mobility scoring system to provide ground truth lameness data. These observers showed significant inter-observer reliability. Video sequences were broken down into their constituent frames and with a further 500 images downloaded from google, annotated with 15 anatomical points for each animal. A modified Mask-RCNN estimated the pose of each cow to output 5 key-points to determine back arching and 2 key-points to determine head position. Using the SORT (simple, online, and real-time tracking) algorithm, cows were tracked as they move through frames of the video sequence (i.e., in moving animals). All the features were combined using the CatBoost gradient boosting algorithm with accuracy being determined using threefold cross-validation including recursive feature elimination. Precision was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient and assessments of precision and recall. This methodology was applied to cows with varying degrees of lameness (according to accredited scoring, n = 3) and demonstrated that some characteristics directly associated with lameness could be monitored simultaneously. By combining the algorithm results over time, more robust evaluation of individual cow lameness was obtained. The model showed high performance for predicting and matching the ground truth lameness data with the outputs of the algorithm. Overall, threefold lameness detection accuracy of 100% and a lameness severity classification accuracy of 94% respectively was achieved with a high degree of precision (Cohen's kappa = 0.8782, precision = 0.8650 and recall = 0.9209).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.