ArticleScientific reports2023
Clinical features predictive of vision loss in patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma: a single tertiary center experience.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Response-Adapted Intravitreal Methotrexate Therapy for Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: A Two-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ocular Imaging in Intraocular Lymphoma: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Rapidly progressive primary vitreoretinal lymphoma with optic disc involvement and retinal detachment.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Optical coherence tomography features and visual prognosis in vitreoretinal lymphoma: a structured phenotyping study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of vitreoretinal lymphoma in Chinese patients (2024).Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Review
- Intraocular Lymphoma: A Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Review
- Multimodal imaging in a case of presumed secondary vitreoretinal lymphoma presenting with inner retina and optic nerve head infiltration.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To clarify the long-term visual prognosis and prognostic factors for vision loss in patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL). This retrospective longitudinal study included 64 consecutive patients with VRL. We analyzed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography findings, and clinical features at every visit. Significant vision loss was defined as a final BCVA ≥ 0.5 logMAR. Predictors of significant vision loss following treatment were evaluated using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. We included 113 eyes of 64 patients (mean age, 64.2 ± 10.9 years), and 49 patients (76.6%) showed bilateral ocular involvement. The mean follow-up duration was 35.4 ± 25.8 months. At diagnosis, 36 (56.3%), 17 (26.6%), and 11 (17.2%) patients had primary, secondary, and concurrent VRL, respectively. All eyes received intraocular methotrexate injections (mean, 17.1 ± 5.5 injections). The mean BCVA improved from 0.44 ± 0.28 at diagnosis to 0.33 ± 0.29 1 month after treatment initiation. Vision improved significantly after treatment (final mean BCVA, 0.24 ± 0.21). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that baseline BCVA and retinal/subretinal infiltration were significantly correlated with vision loss. In this study, a good visual outcome was maintained for > 35 months in patients with VRL. Baseline BCVA and retinal/subretinal infiltration were significant predictors of vision loss after treatment for VRL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.