Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933901›Full record

ArticleApplied nursing research : ANR2023

Validation of the tablet-based Turkish-PAINReportIt® for lung cancer patients after thoracotomy in Turkey.

Sevilay Erden, Seda Karacay Yikar, Sevgi Deniz Doğan, Robert J Lucero, Kardelen Simal Yıldız, Suat Gezer, Evsen Nazik, Sevban Arslan, Yingwei Yao, Diana J Wilkie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sevilay ErdenDepartment of Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. Electronic address: sevilaygil@gmail.com.
Seda Karacay YikarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Sevgi Deniz DoğanUluborlu Selahattin Karasoy Vocational School, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Isparta, Turkey.
Robert J LuceroUniversity of California, Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: rlucero@sonnet.ucla.edu.
Kardelen Simal YıldızUniversity of Central Florida Orlando, FLORIDA Biomedical Sciences, FL, ABD, United States of America.
Suat GezerChest Surgery, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Evsen NazikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Sevban ArslanDepartment of Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Yingwei YaoDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America. Electronic address: y.yao@ufl.edu.
Diana J WilkieDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America. Electronic address: diwilkie@ufl.edu.

Funding

Evaluating the Tablet-based Turkish-PAINReportIt for Assessing Pain of Lung Cancer Patients Post Thoracotomy in TURKEYR01CA207026 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WILKIE, DIANA J · 2017 to 2019
$281k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital pain assessment is advantageous and timely for healthcare priorities in Turkey. However, a multi-dimensional, tablet-based pain assessment tool is not available in the Turkish language. PURPOSE: To validate the Turkish-PAINReportIt® as a multi-dimensional measure of post-thoracotomy pain.

methodsIn the first of a two-phased study, 32 Turkish patients (mean age 47.8 ± 15.6 years, 72 % male) participated in individual cognitive interviews as they completed the tablet-based Turkish-PAINReportIt® once during the first four days post-thoracotomy, and 8 clinicians participated in a focus group discussion of implementation barriers. In the second phase, 80 Turkish patients (mean age 59.0 ± 12.7 years, 80 % male) completed the Turkish-PAINReportIt® preoperatively, on postoperative days 1-4, and at the two-week post-operative follow-up visit.

resultsPatients generally interpreted accurately the Turkish-PAINReportIt® instructions and items. We eliminated some items unnecessary for daily assessment based on focus-group suggestions. In the second study phase, pain scores (intensity, quality, pattern) were low pre-thoracotomy for lung cancer and high postoperatively high on day 1, decreasing on days 2, 3 and 4, and back down to pre-surgical levels at 2-weeks. Over time, pain intensity decreased from post-operative day 1 to post-operative day 4 (p < .001) and from post-operative day 1 to post-operative week 2 (p < .001).

conclusionsThe formative research supported proof of concept and informed the longitudinal study. Findings showed strong validity of the Turkish-PAINReportIt® to detect reduced pain over time as healing occurs after thoracotomy.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsThoracotomyAdultAgedFemaleHumansLanguageLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPainReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyMcGill pain questionnaire painTablet-based pain assessmentThoracotomy painTurkish-PAINReportIt®

Identifiers

PMID36933901
PMCPMC10257141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.