Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933181›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2023

Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs in Chronically Ill Patients Using German Claims Data.

Johannes Wendl, Andreas Simon, Martin Kistler, Jana Hapfelmeier, Antonius Schneider, Alexander Hapfelmeier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes WendlInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Orleansstraße 47, 81667, Munich, Germany. johannes.wendl@mri.tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7140-3507
Andreas SimonVilua Healthcare GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-6304
Martin KistlerVilua Healthcare GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0116-7761
Jana HapfelmeierVilua Healthcare GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4234-1984
Antonius SchneiderInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Orleansstraße 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2847-8626
Alexander HapfelmeierInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Orleansstraße 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6765-6352
Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Infrastruktur, Verkehr und Technologie DIK-2003-0030// DIK0156/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDespite the importance of medication adherence for chronically ill patients and the vast literature on its relationship to costs, this field suffers from methodological limitations. These are caused, amongst others, by the lack of generalizability of data sources, varying definitions of adherence, costs, and model specification. We aim to address this with different modeling approaches and to contribute evidence on the research question.

methodsWe extracted large cohorts of nine chronic diseases (n = 6747-402,898) from German claims data of stationary health insurances between 2012 and 2015 (t0-t3). Defined as the proportion of days covered by medication, we examined the relationship of adherence using several multiple regression models at baseline year t0 with annual total healthcare costs and four sub-categories. Models with concurrent, and differently time-lagged measurements of adherence and costs were compared. Exploratively, we applied non-linear models.

resultsOverall, we found a positive association between the proportion of days covered by medication and total costs, a weak association with outpatient costs, positive with pharmacy costs, and frequently negative with inpatient costs. There were major differences by disease and its severity but little between years, provided adherence and costs were not measured concurrently. The fit of linear models was mainly not inferior to that of non-linear models.

conclusionsThe estimated effect on total costs differed from most other studies, which highlights concerns about generalizability, although effect estimates in sub-categories were as expected. Comparison of time lags indicates the importance of avoiding concurrent measurement. A non-linear relationship should be considered. These methodological approaches are valuable in future research on adherence and its consequences.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsMedication AdherenceChronic DiseaseHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36933181
PMCPMC10119243
OpenAlexW4327811874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.