Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933138›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Detection of Mycoplasma species at various anatomical sites of dogs from different types of kennels.

Ana Beatriz Pinheiro Alves, Leandro Dos Santos Machado, Jenif Braga de Souza, Gabriela Paixão Spenchutt Vieira, Thomas Salles Dias, Virgínia Léo de Almeida, Elmiro Rosendo do Nascimento, Maria Lúcia Barreto, Nathalie Costa Da Cunha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Beatriz Pinheiro AlvesDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva Veterinária E Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Leandro Dos Santos MachadoDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva Veterinária E Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Jenif Braga de SouzaUniversidade Estadual Do Rio de Janeiro E Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gabriela Paixão Spenchutt VieiraDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva Veterinária E Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Thomas Salles DiasDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva Veterinária E Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Virgínia Léo de AlmeidaDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva Veterinária E Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Elmiro Rosendo do NascimentoDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva Veterinária E Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Maria Lúcia BarretoDepartamento de Imunobiologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Nathalie Costa Da CunhaDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva Veterinária E Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil. nathaliecunha@id.uff.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-5098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aimed to detect Mycoplasma cynos, M. canis, M. edwardii, and M. molare in different types of kennels, in addition to evaluating their distribution in different colonization sites. The dogs belonged to different kennels from armed forces (n = 3), shelters (n = 3), and commercial purposes (n = 2). Samples of the oropharynx, genital mucosa, and ear canal were collected from each dog (n = 98), totaling 294 samples. Aliquots were submitted to isolation and the samples confirmed as Mycoplasma spp. were subjected to conventional PCR for M. canis and multiplex PCR for M. edwardii, M. molare, and M. cynos detection. Of the 98 dogs studied, 63.3% (62) were positive in at least one anatomical site evaluated for Mycoplasma spp. Among the 111 anatomical sites positive for Mycoplasma spp., M. canis, M. edwardii, and M. molare were detected in 29.7% (33/111), 40.5% (45/111), and 2.70% (3/111), respectively. No animal was positive for M. cynos.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesMycoplasmaMycoplasma InfectionsAnimalsDogsMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionArmy forceColonizationMycoplasmosisWorking dogs

Identifiers

PMID36933138
PMCPMC10235012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.