Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933091›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2023

Specific absorption rate (SAR) simulations for low-field (< 0.1 T) MRI systems.

Javad Parsa, Andrew Webb

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MRI and Implant Safety at Low-Field and Ultralow-Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Javad ParsaC.J. Gorter MRI Centre, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andrew WebbC.J. Gorter MRI Centre, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. a.webb@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-9732
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo simulate the magnetic and electric fields produced by RF coil geometries commonly used at low field. Based on these simulations, the specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency can be derived to ensure safe operation even when using short RF pulses and high duty cycles.

methodsElectromagnetic simulations were performed at four different field strengths between 0.05 and 0.1 T, corresponding to the lower and upper limits of current point-of-care (POC) neuroimaging systems. Transmit magnetic and electric fields, as well as transmit efficiency and SAR efficiency were simulated. The effects of a close-fitting shield on the EM fields were also assessed. SAR calculations were performed as a function of RF pulse length in turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequences.

resultsSimulations of RF coil characteristics and B

conclusionThis work presents a comprehensive overview of the transmit and SAR efficiencies for RF coils used for POC MRI neuroimaging. While SAR is not a problem for conventional sequences, the values derived here should be useful for RF intensive sequences such as T

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingHeadPhantoms, ImagingRadio WavesElectromagnetic simulationsLow field MRIPoint-of-care MRISpecific absorption rateTransmit efficiency

Identifiers

PMID36933091
PMCPMC10386976
OpenAlexW4327811899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.