Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933076›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2023

Naïve chicks do not prefer objects with stable body orientation, though they may prefer behavioural variability.

Orsola Rosa-Salva, Mikołaj Hernik, Martina Fabbroni, Elena Lorenzi, Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Perception of animate motion in dogs.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Orsola Rosa-SalvaCIMeC Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy. orsola.rosasalva@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1662-6094
Mikołaj HernikUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-5163
Martina FabbroniCIMeC Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Elena LorenziCIMeC Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-4751
Giorgio VallortigaraCIMeC Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-9062

Funding

European Research Council ERC-2011-ADG_20110406, project no. 461 295517, PREMESOR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) have been widely used as a model to study the motion cues that allow visually naïve organisms to detect animate agents shortly after hatching/birth. Our previous work has shown that chicks prefer to approach agents whose main body axis and motion direction are aligned (a feature typical of creatures whose motion is constrained by a bilaterally symmetric body plan). However, it has never been investigated whether chicks are also sensitive to the fact that an agent maintains a stable front-back body orientation in motion (i.e. consistency in which end is leading and which trailing). This is another feature typical of bilateria, which is also associated with the detection of animate agents in humans. The aim of the present study was to fill this gap. Contrary to our initial expectations, after testing 300 chicks across 3 experimental conditions, we found a recurrent preference for the agent which did not maintain a stable front-back body orientation. Since this preference was limited to female chicks, the results are discussed also in relation to sex differences in the social behaviour of this model. Overall, we show for the first time that chicks can discriminate agents based on the stability of their front-back orientation. The unexpected direction of the effect could reflect a preference for agents' whose behaviour is less predictable. Chicks may prefer agents with greater behavioural variability, a trait which has been associated with animate agents, or have a tendency to explore agents performing "odd behaviours".

Indexed as

ChickensMotion PerceptionAnimalsCuesFemaleHumansMaleSocial BehaviorAgencyAnimacyBody orientationDomestic chicksInborn social predispositionsVariability

Identifiers

PMID36933076
PMCPMC10344840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.