Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933074›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Role of [

Samuele Ghezzo, Paola Mapelli, Carolina Bezzi, Ana Maria Samanes Gajate, Giorgio Brembilla, Irene Gotuzzo, Tommaso Russo, Erik Preza, Vito Cucchiara, Naghia Ahmed and 8 more

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Theranostics.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The value of habitat analysis based onBMC medical imaging · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Exploring the role of multimodal [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  18. End-to-end [Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuele GhezzoVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Paola MapelliVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Carolina BezziVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Ana Maria Samanes GajateNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio BrembillaVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Irene GotuzzoSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Tommaso RussoVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Erik PrezaNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vito CucchiaraVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Naghia AhmedPathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ilaria NeriVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Sofia MongardiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FreschiPathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De CobelliVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Luigi GianolliNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paola ScifoNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Maria PicchioVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. picchio.maria@hsr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7532-6211
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro grant IG 2017 Id.20571Italian Ministry of Health PE-2016-02361273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the role of [

methodsThis retrospective study included 47 PCa patients who underwent [

resultsISUP grade at biopsy was upgraded in 9/47 patients after prostatectomy, resulting in a bACC = 85.9%, SN = 71.9%, SP = 100%, PPV = 100%, and NPV = 62.5%, while the best-performing radiomic model yielded a bACC = 87.6%, SN = 88.6%, SP = 86.7%, PPV = 94%, and NPV = 82.5%. All radiomic models trained with at least 2 RFs (GLSZM-Zone Entropy and Shape-Least Axis Length) outperformed the control models. Conversely, no significant differences were found for radiomic models trained with 2 or more RFs (Mann-Whitney p > 0.05).

conclusionThese findings support the role of [

Indexed as

Gallium RadioisotopesProstatic NeoplasmsGallium IsotopesHumansMalePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective Studiesgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesPSMA-11ISUP gradePETProstate cancerPSMARadiomics

Identifiers

PMID36933074
OpenAlexW4327811821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.