Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933048›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023

The goals of care in acute setting for geriatric patients in case of a hip fracture.

Thomas Marcus Paulus Nijdam, Duco Willem Pieter Marie Laane, Tim Ellen Eloeska Schiepers, Diederik Pieter Johan Smeeing, Diederik Hendrik Ruth Kempen, Hanna Cunera Willems, Detlef van der Velde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Exploring the role of systemic inflammation in guiding clinical decision making for geriatric patients with a hip fracture.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas Marcus Paulus NijdamDepartment of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Duco Willem Pieter Marie LaaneDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. d.w.p.m.laane-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-3692
Tim Ellen Eloeska SchiepersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diederik Pieter Johan SmeeingDepartment of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diederik Hendrik Ruth KempenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanna Cunera WillemsDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Detlef van der VeldeDepartment of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor geriatric hip fracture patients, the decision between surgery and palliative, non-operative management is made through shared decision making (SDM). For this conversation, a physician must be familiar with the patient's goals of care (GOC). These are predominantly unknown for hip fracture patients and challenging to assess in acute setting. The objective was to explore these GOC of geriatric patients in case of a hip fracture.

methodsAn expert panel gathered possible outcomes after a hip fracture, which were transformed into statements where participants indicated their relative importance on a 100-point scoring scale during interviews. These GOC were ranked using medians and deemed important if the median score was 90 or above. Patients were aged 70 years or older with a hip contusion due to similarities with the hip fracture population. Three cohorts based on frailty criteria and the diagnosis of dementia were made.

resultsPreserving cognitive function, being with family and being with partner scored in all groups among the most important GOC. Both non-frail and frail geriatric patients scored return to pre-fracture mobility and maintaining independence among the most important GOC, where proxies of patients with a diagnosis of dementia scored not experiencing pain as the most important GOC.

conclusionAll groups scored preserving cognitive function, being with family and being with partner among the most important GOC. The most important GOC should be discussed when a patient is presented with a hip fracture. Since patients preferences vary, a patient-centered assessment of the GOC remains essential.

Indexed as

DementiaHip FracturesAgedCommunicationGeriatric AssessmentHumansPainPatient Care PlanningGeriatricGoals of careHip fractureShared decision makingTrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID36933048
PMCPMC10449659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.