Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36933004›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Effectiveness and acceptability of home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10 weeks of pregnancy.

Volodymyr Podolskyi, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Lena L Maltzman, Lena Marions

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02191774 (Medical Abortion up to 10 Weeks Gestation at Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02191774 completednot on this map

Medical Abortion up to 10 Weeks Gestation at Home

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2014 to 2021Enrolled273ConditionsPregnancy Complications, Legally Induced Abortion Without Mention of ComplicationArmsMedical abortion at home
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Sociodemographic Benefits of Extending MS-2Step to 70 Days in Australia.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Volodymyr PodolskyiDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2875-6195
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-1444
Lena L MaltzmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena MarionsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5930-4485
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

Svenska institutet 00352/2014Vetenskapsrådet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe administration of mifepristone, followed by misoprostol, is widely used for medical abortion. Many studies have demonstrated home abortion to be safe in pregnancies up to 63 days of gestation, and recent data support its safety when extended to more advanced pregnancies. We studied the efficacy and acceptability of home use of misoprostol up to 70 days of gestation in a Swedish setting and compared the outcomes between pregnancies with a gestational age of up to 63 days and pregnancies with gestational age 64-70 days. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis prospective cohort study was performed between November 2014 and November 2021 at Södersjukhuset and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, and some patients were also recruited from Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg and Helsingborg Hospital. The primary outcome was the rate of complete abortions and was defined as complete abortion without any need for surgical or medical intervention and assessed by clinical assessment, pregnancy test and/or vaginal ultrasound. Secondary objectives were assessed by daily self-reporting in a diary and included pain, bleeding, side effects and women's satisfaction and perception of home use of misoprostol. A comparison of categorical variables was made with Fisher's exact test. The significance level was set to a p-value ≤0.05. The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on July 14, 2014 (NCT02191774).

resultsDuring the study period we enrolled 273 women opting for medical abortion with home use of misoprostol. In the early group, up to 63 days of gestation, 112 women were included with a mean gestational length of 45 days and in the late group, 64-70 days of gestation, 161 women with a mean gestations length of 66.3 days were included. Complete abortion occurred in 95% (95% CI 89-98) of women in the early group and in 96% (95% CI 92-99) in the late group. No differences were found regarding side effects and acceptability was similarly high in both groups.

conclusionsOur results show high efficacy and acceptability of medical abortion when misoprostol is administered at home up to 70 days of gestation. This supports previous findings about maintained safety when misoprostol is administered at home even past a very early pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalAbortion, InducedMisoprostolAdministration, IntravaginalFemaleHumansInfantMifepristonePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstProspective StudiesAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalMifepristoneMisoprostolabortionsacceptancefirst trimesterhome usemedical abortionmifepristonemisoprostol

Identifiers

PMID36933004
PMCPMC10072251
OpenAlexW4327811339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.