ArticleJournal of anatomy2023
Comparative study of cranial measurements between sexes from Brazil and The Netherlands: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphometric and morphological assessment of the piriform aperture in dry crania: anatomical observations and surgical implications.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Heights of maxillary sinus and piriform aperture are valuable in sex prediction: a cone beam computed tomography study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
- Gender Determination Based on CBCT Maxillary Sinus Analysis: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparative study of cranial measurements between sexes from Brazil and The Netherlands: A cone-beam computed tomography study.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to better understand human variation by comparing cone-beam computed tomography-based cranial measurements between both sexes of individuals from two distinct populations: Brazilian and Dutch. Cone-beam computed tomography volumes of 311 patients between 20 and 60 years from Brazil and The Netherlands were selected. Two radiologists performed 16 linear measurements in the maxillary sinuses and mandibular canal. Kruskall-Wallis test compared measurements of the two cranial structures between male and female for the two populations and four age ranges (20-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60). Mann-Whitney test compared individual measurements obtained from the cranial structures between male and female for each population, and between both populations for both sexes. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation test (α = 0.05). No significant differences were found in the linear measurements among the experimental groups including sex, population and age group for both cranial structures (p > 0.05). Most of the cranial linear measurements were significantly higher for male than those for female irrespective of the population (p ≤ 0.05). When the populations were compared regardless of sex, Brazilians presented four significantly higher measurements, and Dutch presented seven significantly higher measurements (p ≤ 0.05). The assessed cranial structures did not differ between Brazilian and Dutch populations for both sexes and four age ranges. Multiple linear measurements differed between both populations with a predominance of larger dimensions for the Dutch population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.