Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36932842›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2023

Model-based reconstructions for intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion tensor imaging parameter map estimations.

Susanne S Rauh, Oliver Maier, Oliver J Gurney-Champion, Melissa T Hooijmans, Rudolf Stollberger, Aart J Nederveen, Gustav J Strijkers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne S RauhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6526-7847
Oliver MaierInstitute of Medical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Oliver J Gurney-ChampionDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Melissa T HooijmansDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-1383
Rudolf StollbergerInstitute of Medical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Aart J NederveenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gustav J StrijkersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLGraz University of Technology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) facilitate noninvasive quantification of tissue perfusion and diffusion. Both are promising biomarkers in various diseases and a combined acquisition is therefore desirable. This comes with challenges, including noisy parameter maps and long scan times, especially for the perfusion fraction f and pseudo-diffusion coefficient D*. A model-based reconstruction has the potential to overcome these challenges. As a first step, our goal was to develop a model-based reconstruction framework for IVIM and combined IVIM-DTI parameter estimation. The IVIM and IVIM-DTI models were implemented in the PyQMRI model-based reconstruction framework and validated with simulations and in vivo data. Commonly used voxel-wise nonlinear least-squares fitting was used as the reference. Simulations with the IVIM and IVIM-DTI models were performed with 100 noise realizations to assess accuracy and precision. Diffusion-weighted data were acquired for IVIM reconstruction in the liver (n = 5), as well as for IVIM-DTI in the kidneys (n = 5) and lower-leg muscles (n = 6) of healthy volunteers. The median and interquartile range (IQR) values of the IVIM and IVIM-DTI parameters were compared to assess bias and precision. With model-based reconstruction, the parameter maps exhibited less noise, which was most pronounced in the f and D* maps, both in the simulations and in vivo. The bias values in the simulations were comparable between model-based reconstruction and the reference method. The IQR was lower with model-based reconstruction compared with the reference for all parameters. In conclusion, model-based reconstruction is feasible for IVIM and IVIM-DTI and improves the precision of the parameter estimates, particularly for f and D* maps.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansLiverMotionMuscle, SkeletaldiffusionDTIIVIMmodel-based reconstructionquantitative MRI

Identifiers

PMID36932842
PMCPMC13587258
OpenAlexW4327811495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.