ArticleGlobal spine journal2024
Can a Novel Natural Language Processing Model and Artificial Intelligence Automatically Generate Billing Codes From Spine Surgical Operative Notes?
Article in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Current Procedural Terminology Coding in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery: Promise or Premature?Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- A Multi-Schedule Machine Learning Pipeline for Medicare Reimbursement Change Prediction and Operational Risk Stratification.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Classification of Cleft and Craniofacial Procedures From Operative Notes: Model Development and Feasibility Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- Multidisciplinary perspectives on artificial intelligence in aging research and education: evolving uses, ethics, and equity considerations in gerontology.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Coding: Evaluating Large Language Models for Current Procedural Terminology Accuracy in Hand Surgery.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- Artificially Intelligent Billing in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of a Large Language Model.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Automated CPT Code Prediction in Endovascular Neurosurgery.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Orthopaedic surgeons display a positive outlook towards artificial intelligence: A survey among members of the AGA Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Performance of a Large Language Model in the Generation of Clinical Guidelines for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery.Neurospine · 2024Article
- Applications of natural language processing tools in the surgical journey.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Natural language processing for the automated detection of intra-operative elements in lumbar spine surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective cohort.
objectiveBilling and coding-related administrative tasks are a major source of healthcare expenditure in the United States. We aim to show that a second-iteration Natural Language Processing (NLP) machine learning algorithm, XLNet, can automate the generation of CPT codes from operative notes in ACDF, PCDF, and CDA procedures.
methodsWe collected 922 operative notes from patients who underwent ACDF, PCDF, or CDA from 2015 to 2020 and included CPT codes generated by the billing code department. We trained XLNet, a generalized autoregressive pretraining method, on this dataset and tested its performance by calculating AUROC and AUPRC.
resultsThe performance of the model approached human accuracy. Trial 1 (ACDF) achieved an AUROC of .82 (range: .48-.93), an AUPRC of .81 (range: .45-.97), and class-by-class accuracy of 77% (range: 34%-91%); trial 2 (PCDF) achieved an AUROC of .83 (.44-.94), an AUPRC of .70 (.45-.96), and class-by-class accuracy of 71% (42%-93%); trial 3 (ACDF and CDA) achieved an AUROC of .95 (.68-.99), an AUPRC of .91 (.56-.98), and class-by-class accuracy of 87% (63%-99%); trial 4 (ACDF, PCDF, CDA) achieved an AUROC of .95 (.76-.99), an AUPRC of .84 (.49-.99), and class-by-class accuracy of 88% (70%-99%).
conclusionsWe show that the XLNet model can be successfully applied to orthopedic surgeon's operative notes to generate CPT billing codes. As NLP models as a whole continue to improve, billing can be greatly augmented with artificial intelligence assisted generation of CPT billing codes which will help minimize error and promote standardization in the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.