Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36932378›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2023

Association between neonatal near miss and infant development: the Ribeirão Preto and São Luís birth cohorts (BRISA).

Liliana Yanet Gómez Aristizábal, Paulo Ricardo Higassiaraguti Rocha, Susana Cararo Confortin, Vanda Maria Ferreira Simões, Heloisa Bettiol, Marco Antonio Barbieri, Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva

Full text read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liliana Yanet Gómez AristizábalFederal University of Maranhão (UFMA). Graduate Program in Collective Health, Rua Barão de Itapary, 155, Maranhão, 65020-070, São Luís, Brazil. lilianayanetgomez@gmail.com.
Paulo Ricardo Higassiaraguti RochaRibeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Susana Cararo ConfortinFederal University of Maranhão (UFMA). Graduate Program in Collective Health, Rua Barão de Itapary, 155, Maranhão, 65020-070, São Luís, Brazil.
Vanda Maria Ferreira SimõesFederal University of Maranhão (UFMA). Graduate Program in Collective Health, Rua Barão de Itapary, 155, Maranhão, 65020-070, São Luís, Brazil.
Heloisa BettiolRibeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Antonio BarbieriRibeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antônio Augusto Moura da SilvaFederal University of Maranhão (UFMA). Graduate Program in Collective Health, Rua Barão de Itapary, 155, Maranhão, 65020-070, São Luís, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyze the association between neonatal near miss and infant development at two years.

methodsData from two birth cohorts, one conducted in Ribeirão Preto (RP)/São Paulo and the other in São Luís (SL)/Maranhão, were used. The cognitive, motor and communication development of children was evaluated using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). The following criteria were used for the definition of NNM: birth weight < 1,500 g, 5-min Apgar score < 7, gestational age < 32 weeks, and report of congenital malformations. The relationship between neonatal near miss and development was assessed using the weighted propensity score from the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW). A directed acyclic graph was built to select the adjustment variables.

resultsA total of 1,050 mother-newborn dyads were evaluated in SL and 1,840 in RP. Regarding outcomes in SL and RP, respectively, 2.4% and 17.3% of the children were not competent in the cognitive domain, 12.1% and 13.3% in the receptive communication domain, 39.2% and 47.1% in the expressive communication domain, 20.7% and 12.6% in the fine motor domain, and 14.3% and 13.8% in the gross motor domain. The prevalence of neonatal near miss was 5.4% in SL and 4.3% in RP. Unadjusted analysis showed an association of neonatal near miss with fine motor development in SL and RP and with the cognitive, receptive communication, expressive communication, and gross motor domains only in RP. These associations remained after adjusted analysis.

conclusionNeonatal near miss is a risk factor for developmental delays.

Indexed as

Birth CohortNear Miss, HealthcareBrazilCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightSocioeconomic FactorsBayley scalesBirth cohortChild developmentNeonatal near miss

Identifiers

PMID36932378
PMCPMC10024445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read46
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.