Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36932361›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2023

The impact of inotersen on Neuropathy Impairment Score in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.

Aaron Yarlas, Andrew Lovley, Duncan Brown, Montserrat Vera-Llonch, Sami Khella, Chafic Karam

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01737398 (A Phase 2/3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ISIS 420915 in Patients With Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01737398 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 2/3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ISIS 420915 in Patients With Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (NEURO-TTR Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIonis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2013 to 2017Enrolled173ConditionsFAP, Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy, TTR, TransthyretinArmsInotersen, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron YarlasQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Suite 216E, Johnston, RI, 02919, USA. aarony1970@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4600-259X
Andrew LovleyQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Suite 216E, Johnston, RI, 02919, USA. alovley@qualitymetric.com.
Duncan BrownIonis Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA.
Montserrat Vera-LlonchIonis Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA.
Sami KhellaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chafic KaramUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
GroundMetrics (United States) · USIonis Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) frequently experience symptoms of polyneuropathy (PN) that worsen over time and impair daily functioning. Previous analyses supported efficacy of inotersen, an antisense oligonucleotide, to slow neuropathic progression in patients with ATTRv-PN, as indicated by larger mean changes, relative to placebo, in total score and several subscales of the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS), and for the subset of NIS items specific to lower limbs (NIS-LL) for the overall study sample. A key objective of the current study was to evaluate efficacy of inotersen for slowing neuropathic progression in NIS/NIS-LL within key clinical subgroups of patients with ATTRv-PN. Additionally, for this study, responder definition (RD) thresholds were estimated for NIS/NIS-LL total and subscale scores, for the purpose of evaluating clinically meaningful benefit of inotersen at the individual patient-level.

methodsPost hoc analyses used data from the NEURO-TTR phase 3 trial of inotersen in patients with ATTRv-PN (NCT01737398). Treatment differences in mean changes on NIS/NIS-LL total and subscale scores from baseline to week 65 were examined within patient subgroups defined by clinical characteristics. Anchor- and distribution-based approaches estimated RDs for NIS/NIS-LL scores, with responders defined as patients who did not experience clinically meaningful neuropathic progression. Responder analyses compared the proportion of patients classified as responders for each NIS/NIS-LL score between treatment arms.

resultsWithin each patient subgroup, mean increases in NIS/NIS-LL total and muscle weakness subscales were significantly smaller after 65 weeks of treatment with inotersen compared to placebo. Similar patterns were observed for some, but not all, subgroups on NIS/NIS-LL reflex subscale scores. Recommended RDs were 8.1 points for NIS total and 4.7 points for NIS-LL total. Patients receiving inotersen for 65 weeks were significantly less likely than those receiving placebo to exhibit clinically meaningful increases on NIS/NIS-LL total, muscle weakness, and sensation subscales.

conclusionsThis study supports previous evidence for efficacy of inotersen in this patient population and provides interpretation guidelines for clinically meaningful changes in NIS/NIS-LL scores.

Indexed as

Amyloid Neuropathies, FamilialPolyneuropathiesHumansMuscle WeaknessOligonucleotidesInotersenOligonucleotidesHereditary transthyretin amyloidosisInotersenNeuropathic progressionNeuropathy

Identifiers

PMID36932361
PMCPMC10022100
OpenAlexW4327811528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read33
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.