Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36932335›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2023

Monkeypox epidemiology, clinical presentation, and transmission: a systematic review.

Ashima Sharma, Hari Prasad, Nidhi Kaeley, Aparna Bondalapati, Lokesh Edara, Y Ajay Kumar

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monkeypox in South Asia: a systematic review.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mpox Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Nigeria, 2022.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashima SharmaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India.
Hari PrasadDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Nidhi KaeleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India. nidhi.em@aiimsrishikesh.edu.in.
Aparna BondalapatiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India.
Lokesh EdaraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Western Michigan University School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Y Ajay KumarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India.
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · INWestern Michigan University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe new zoonotic viral infection, monkeypox, is a global health issue. Our study aimed at studying the epidemiology, clinical presentation, complications, case fatality rate, and transmission among the present cases of monkeypox infection.

methodsArticles were searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases using the keywords "Monkeypox" [MeSH] or "Monkeypox virus" (MeSH). Narrative reviews, conference abstracts, commentaries, and articles in languages other than English were excluded.

resultsFrom three databases, 1442 studies were identified. Seven hundred ten articles were excluded because they included data before 2022, leaving 732 items for screening. After filtering 320 data due to data duplication, 412 remained. Due to the inclusion of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, reviews, comments, and articles in languages other than English, 257 were excluded. Eligibility based on full-text review was applied to the remaining 155, excluding 129. So, the study covered a total of remaining 26 articles. We studied 2352 confirmed cases from published literature, accounting for approximately 4% of infected cases worldwide. Around 81.71% of patients have a bisexual or men having sex with men (MSM) preference. Approximately 30.18% of confirmed cases were HIV positive. Male sex was also identified as a risk factor in our review.

conclusionMonkeypox human-to-human and human-to-animal transmission are rising. Thus, it is essential to do research on the prevention, clinicodemographic trends, and treatment of monkeypox. Understanding this will enable us to treat monkeypox patients with a targeted and focused approach.

Indexed as

ComplicationsEpidemiologyMonkeypoxMonkeypox virusTransmission

Identifiers

PMID36932335
PMCPMC10021050
OpenAlexW4327714846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read15
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.