Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36932266›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2023

Health-Related Social Needs: Which Patients Respond to Screening and Who Receives Resources?

Nazleen Bharmal, Alex Rennick, Amy Shideler, Madeleine Blazel, Robert Jones, Chi' Wilson, Elizabeth R Pfoh

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nazleen BharmalCommunity Health & Partnerships, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Community Health, Cleveland, OH, USA. bharman2@ccf.org.
Alex RennickCleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Amy ShidelerCleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Madeleine BlazelCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Robert JonesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at CWRU, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Chi' WilsonCleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Elizabeth R PfohCleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-260X

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002547 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DWEIK, RAED A. · 2018 to 2022
$7.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002547NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR002547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems are screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSN) but the optimal approach is unknown.

objectiveTo describe the variation in responding to an HRSN questionnaire delivered via patient portal, and whether referral to and resources provided by social workers differed by response status.

designRetrospective observational study.

participantsPrimary care patients with a visit between June 2020 and January 2022.

interventionHRSN questionnaire MAIN MEASURES: We identified each patient's index visit (e.g., date of their first questionnaire response for responders or their first visit within the study period for non-responders). Through the EHR, we identified patients' demographic characteristics. We linked the area deprivation index (ADI) to each patient and grouped patients into quintiles. We used multilevel logistic regressions to identify characteristics associated with responding to the questionnaire and, for responders, reporting a need. We also determined if responder status was associated with receiving a social worker referral or receiving a resource. We included patient demographics and ADI quintile as fixed variables and practice site as a random variable. KEY

resultsOur study included 386,997 patients, of which 51% completed at least one HRSN questionnaire question. Patients with Medicaid insurance (AOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.61, 0.64) and those who lived in higher ADI neighborhoods had lower adjusted odds of responding (AOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.78 comparing quintile 5 to quintile 1). Of responders, having Medicaid insurance (versus private) increased the adjusted odds of reporting each of the HRSN needs by two- to eightfold (p < 0.01). Patients who completed a questionnaire (versus non-responders) had similar adjusted odds of receiving a referral (AOR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.02) and receiving a resource from a SW (AOR: AOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 0.79, 1.77).

conclusionHRSN questionnaire responses may not accurately represent the needs of patients, especially when delivered solely via patient portal.

Indexed as

MedicaidPatientsHumansLogistic ModelsSocial WorkersSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36932266
PMCPMC10506999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.