Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36932250›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Automatic Classification of Mass Shape and Margin on Mammography with Artificial Intelligence: Deep CNN Versus Radiomics.

Longxiu Qi, Xing Lu, Hailin Shen, Qilei Gao, Zhigang Han, Jianguo Zhu, You Meng, Linhua Wang, Shuangqing Chen, Yonggang Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Longxiu QiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Province, 215006, Suzhou City, China.
Xing LuSanmed Biotech Inc, Zhuhai City, Guangzhou Province, China.
Hailin ShenDepartment of Radiology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Jiangsu Province, 215028, Suzhou City, China.
Qilei GaoDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhigang HanDepartment of Radiology, Huaian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Huaian City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jianguo ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Xinghai Hospital of Suzhou Industry Park, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China.
You MengDepartment of Breast Surgery, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Linhua WangDepartment of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. 983479928@qq.com.
Shuangqing ChenDepartment of Radiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, 215001, Suzhou City, China. sznaonao@163.com.
Yonggang LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Province, 215006, Suzhou City, China. liyonggang224@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8974-3094
Suzhou Municipal Hospital · CNHainan Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNJiangnan University · CNNantong University · CNSoochow University · CNSuzhou Kowloon Hospital · CNXuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility for deep CNN-based artificial intelligence methods for automatic classification of the mass margin and shape, while radiomic feature-based machine learning methods were also implemented in this study as baseline and for comparison study. In this retrospective study, 596 patients with breast mass that underwent mammography from 4 hospitals were enrolled from January 2012 to October 2019. Margin and shape of each mass were annotated according to BI-RADS by 2 experienced radiologists. Deep CNN-based AI was implemented for the classification task based on Resnet50. Balanced sampler and CBAM were also used to improve the performance of the Deep CNNs. As comparison, image texture features were extracted and then dimensionality reduction methods (such as PCA, ICA) and classical classifiers (such as SVM, DT, KNN) were used for classification task. Based on Python programming software, accuracy (ACC) was used to evaluate the performance of the model, and the model with the highest ACC value was selected. Deep CNN based on Resnet50 with balanced sampler and CBAM achieved the best performance for both margin and shape classification, with ACC of 0.838 and 0.874, respectively. For the radiomics-based machine learning, the best performance for margin was achieved as 0.676 by the combination of FA + RF, while the best performance for shape was 0.802 by the combination of PCA + MLP. The feasibility for automatic classification with coarse labeling of the mass shape and margin was testified with the deep CNN-based AI methods, while radiomic feature-based machine learning methods achieved inferior classification results.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningHumansMammographyRetrospective StudiesSoftwareBreast massDeep learningMachine learningMarginShape

Identifiers

PMID36932250
PMCPMC10406738
OpenAlexW4327701572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.