ArticleJournal of human hypertension2023
Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults with hypertension: the HYPER-COG study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discriminative performance of the clock drawing test for screening cognitive function in hypertensive patients aged ≥ 50 years: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Assessment of cognitive function in elderly patients with heart failure.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is a major risk factor for dementia. Yet, the most suitable cognitive screening test for hypertensive patients has yet to be identified. This study investigated cognitive impairment in hypertensive older adults and compared the discriminative ability of the most widely used cognitive screening tests. The study involved hypertensive patients aged 65+ without prior diagnosis of cognitive impairment, from the Hypertension Clinic of Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), MiniCog and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) were administered, using a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment as gold standard. The ROC curve analysis and the paired chi-square test were used to compare the discriminative ability, sensitivity and specificity for cognitive impairment of the different screening instruments. Cognitive impairment was diagnosed in 37% of 94 participants (mean age 76, 55% female), mainly involving attention and executive functions. The MoCA (AUC = 0.746), the MMSE (AUC = 0.689) and the MiniCog (AUC = 0.684) showed similar ability in detecting cognitive impairment, while the CDT had a poorer discriminative capacity (AUC = 0.535). The sensitivity of MoCA (80%) and of MMSE/MiniCog combination (74%) was higher in comparison with MiniCog alone (49%, p = 0.007 and 0.004, respectively), while MiniCog achieved the highest specificity (88%, p < 0.001 vs all). Cognitive impairment was detected in more than one-third of hypertensive older adults without prior diagnosis of dementia. MoCA, MMSE and MiniCog showed similar discriminative ability for cognitive impairment, with MoCa and MMSE showing greater sensitivity and MiniCog the highest specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.