ArticleJournal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
Muscle-to-Bone and Soft Tissue-to-Bone Ratio in Children and Adolescents with Obesity.
Article in Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sarcopenic obesity and skeletal development in children: recent advances.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the total and regional muscle-to-bone ratio in children and adolescents with obesity and compare the muscle-to-bone ratio (MBR) and soft tissue-to-bone ratio (SBR) to their peers with normal weight or overweight. STUDY
designA total of 219 male and female pediatrics (mean age=12.3±2.5 years) participated in this study. Body composition was assessed with a total body dual X-ray absorptiometry. The MBR was calculated by dividing lean mass by bone mineral content. The SBR was determined by dividing the soft tissue mass (i.e., lean mass+fat mass) by bone mineral content. Differences in total and regional body composition measures between body mass index (BMI) percentile groups was assessed by ANOVA.
resultsThe obesity group had significantly higher MBR compared to the normal weight group for total (19.24±1.56 vs. 18.26±1.64), arm (17.11±1.67 vs. 15.88±1.81), and leg (18.41±1.68 vs. 16.62±1.55). Similarly, the obesity group had significantly higher MBR in the leg (18.41±1.68) compared to the overweight group (17.24±1.45). However, the overweight group was not significantly different from the normal weight or the obesity group for total and arm MBR. The total, arm, and leg SBR was significantly different between all BMI groups. Across the entire sample, MBR and SBR were negatively associated with high-density lipoprotein. SBR was positively associated with insulin, HOMA-IR, low-density lipoprotein, very low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure.
conclusionsChildren with obesity had a higher MBR and SBR compared to their normal weight peers. In addition, there were significant associations between SBR, higher levels of insulin, atherogenic lipoproteins, and increased systolic blood pressure. Thus, SBR may be useful as a marker for increased cardiometabolic disease risk, though more research in this area is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.