Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36931904›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

Epidemiology of chemical burns: An 11-year retrospective study of 126 patients at a referral burn centre in the north of Iran.

Hojat Eftekhari, Mahsa Sadeghi, Mohammadreza Mobayen, Mojdeh Esmailzadeh, Alireza Feizkhah, Majid Salimi Lahiji, Ali Taghizadeh Pourgarfami, Parissa Bagheri Toolaroud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hojat EftekhariSkin Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Raht, Guilan, Iran.
Mahsa SadeghiBurn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mohammadreza MobayenBurn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mojdeh EsmailzadehBurn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Alireza FeizkhahBurn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Majid Salimi LahijiSchool of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Ali Taghizadeh PourgarfamiSchool of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Parissa Bagheri ToolaroudBurn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Guilan University of Medical Sciences · IRKashan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The etiology and outcomes of chemical burns vary worldwide, influenced by the local population structure, industry distribution, and geographical and social environments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of chemical burns among patients referred to a burn centre in the north of Iran. A single-centre, retrospective study was conducted on patients with chemical burns between 2011 and 2021. Data collection was carried out using the hospital information system (HIS), and data collected from medical records included gender, age, marital status, occupations, burn season, place of residence, intention to burn, location of the accident, percent of total body surface area (%TBSA), the primary cause of burns, the body region of the burn, length of hospital stay (days), infection, and discharge status. The data were analysed using descriptive statistical methods and SPSS 24.0 software. Of the 10 133 burn patients treated in a burn centre in the north of Iran between 2011 and 2021, 1.2% had chemical burns. The average age of patients was 34.45 (SD = 22.16) years, and most chemical burns cases were male (70.6%, n = 89). Chemical burns occurred most frequently in patients aged 20 to 49 years (69.8%, n = 107), and most of the burns were accidental (84.9%, n = 107). The home was the most common place of chemical burn injury, accounting for 49.2% (62 cases), followed by the workplace (43.7%, n = 55), respectively. Most chemical burns occurred in the summer season (36.5%, n = 46), and acid (74.6%, n = 94) was the most common cause of chemical burns. The mean TBSA was 16.41 (SD = 15.10). The most common burn area was the lower limb (34.9%, n = 44), and the overall mortality rate was 4.8%. The average length of stay in the hospital was 6.53 (SD = 5.57) days. Community education on household safety, restricting non-specialists' access to chemical substances, and the promotion of early consultation could reduce chemical burn prevalence and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Burns, ChemicalAdultBurn UnitsFemaleHumansIranLength of StayMaleReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studiesacidsalkaliesburnschemicalepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID36931904
PMCPMC10410324
OpenAlexW4327694216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.