Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36931821›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2023

Measuring affect in daily life: A multilevel psychometric evaluation of the PANAS-X across four ecological momentary assessment samples.

Alison M Haney, Megan N Fleming, Andrea M Wycoff, Sarah A Griffin, Timothy J Trull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tinnitus Measured in Everyday Life: A Literature Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison M HaneyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-4593
Megan N FlemingDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Andrea M WycoffDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Sarah A GriffinCollege of Human Sciences and Humanities, University of Houston-Clear Lake.
Timothy J TrullDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-9935-7939

Funding

PILOT--GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO CONSUMPTION IN CHINESE SAMPLEP50AA011998 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHER, KENNETH JAMES · 1999 to 2008
$12.6M
Psychology of Alcohol Use and Dependence TrainingT32AA013526 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DENIS M MCCARTHY, KENNETH JAMES SHER · 2002 to 2026
$9.0M
Resource CoreP60AA011998 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, PAMELA ANN · 2009 to 2013
$8.8M
Characterizing Affective Instability Using EMAR21MH069472 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI TRULL, TIMOTHY J · 2004 to 2006
$539k
Emotion regulation in emotional distress disorder: fMRI and ambulatory assessmentR21MH100359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI KERNS, JOHN G, TRULL, TIMOTHY J · 2014 to 2015
$404k
Ambulatory assessment of alcohol use, mood dysregulation, and alcohol cravingR21AA022099 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI SHER, KENNETH JAMES, TRULL, TIMOTHY J · 2013 to 2014
$381k
Using laboratory alcohol administration and ecological momentary assessment to identify risk factors for simultaneous alcohol and marijuana useF31AA027958 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI WYCOFF, ANDREA M. · 2019 to 2020
$68k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA027958NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA011998NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA011998NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA022099NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA013526NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH069472NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH100359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there is strong evidence for the psychometric reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (PANAS-X) in cross-sectional studies, the between- and within-person psychometric performance of the PANAS-X in an intensive longitudinal framework is less understood. As affect is thought to be dynamic and responsive to context, this study investigated the multilevel reliability of PANAS-X Positive Affect, Negative Affect, Fear, Sadness, and Hostility scales. Generalizability theory and structural equation modeling techniques (coefficient ω) were employed in four ecological momentary assessment samples (

Indexed as

AffectEcological Momentary AssessmentCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36931821
PMCPMC10213137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.