ArticleBJGP open2023
GP roles in emergency medical services: a systematic mapping review and narrative synthesis.
Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilisation of a GP-staffed emergency response unit: an observational study from Norway.BJGP open · 2026Article
- General practitioners' acceptability to handle unscheduled visits: a french nationwide cross-sectional survey.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- An analysis of characteristics and associated factors for re-contacts after EMS non-conveyance: a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Conceptualising social prescribing in urgent and emergency care.Future healthcare journal · 2024Article
- Scoping review of the effectiveness of 10 high-impact initiatives (HIIs) for recovering urgent and emergency care services.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Hybrid emergency care at the home for patients - A multiple case study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Primary care doctors in acute call-outs to severe trauma incidents in Norway - associations with factors related to patients and doctors.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA significant proportion of emergency medical services (EMS) work is for problems that may be amenable to timely primary care management and could benefit from GP input. Utilising GPs in EMS may reduce avoidable emergency department (ED) conveyance, releasing emergency ambulances for higher-acuity care, and meeting patient needs earlier in the evolution of an emergency call.
aimTo collate and summarise evidence on how GPs are utilised in EMS. DESIGN &
settingSystematic mapping review and narrative synthesis.
methodA systematic literature search was conducted using search terms for general practice and emergency care. Primary research articles investigating the utilisation of GPs in non-critical EMS were included. An inductive framework was used to structure the results alongside a narrative synthesis.
resultsTwenty-one articles were included. GPs were embedded in EMS for urgent management of high-acuity patients or used as an intervention to avoid unnecessary ED conveyance in selected lower-acuity patients. The importance of interprofessional relationships and training for GPs involved in EMS was highlighted. No studies explored patient-reported outcomes. Outcomes measured were predominantly ED non-conveyance and admission avoidance, with GP services as an intervention reducing the likelihood of these outcomes.
conclusionEmbedding GPs in EMS might service different purposes depending on context. There is some evidence that GP EMS services may reduce the likelihood of ED conveyance and hospital admission in selected cases; it is unclear whether this is owing to case selection or GP involvement. Future research should incorporate patients' views and experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.