Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36931699›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2023

GP roles in emergency medical services: a systematic mapping review and narrative synthesis.

Alexander Burrell, Grace Scrimgeour, Matthew Booker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alexander BurrellCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK alex.burrell@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0800-3452
Grace ScrimgeourBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.
Matthew BookerCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of emergency medical services (EMS) work is for problems that may be amenable to timely primary care management and could benefit from GP input. Utilising GPs in EMS may reduce avoidable emergency department (ED) conveyance, releasing emergency ambulances for higher-acuity care, and meeting patient needs earlier in the evolution of an emergency call.

aimTo collate and summarise evidence on how GPs are utilised in EMS. DESIGN &

settingSystematic mapping review and narrative synthesis.

methodA systematic literature search was conducted using search terms for general practice and emergency care. Primary research articles investigating the utilisation of GPs in non-critical EMS were included. An inductive framework was used to structure the results alongside a narrative synthesis.

resultsTwenty-one articles were included. GPs were embedded in EMS for urgent management of high-acuity patients or used as an intervention to avoid unnecessary ED conveyance in selected lower-acuity patients. The importance of interprofessional relationships and training for GPs involved in EMS was highlighted. No studies explored patient-reported outcomes. Outcomes measured were predominantly ED non-conveyance and admission avoidance, with GP services as an intervention reducing the likelihood of these outcomes.

conclusionEmbedding GPs in EMS might service different purposes depending on context. There is some evidence that GP EMS services may reduce the likelihood of ED conveyance and hospital admission in selected cases; it is unclear whether this is owing to case selection or GP involvement. Future research should incorporate patients' views and experiences.

Indexed as

community careemergency medical servicesgeneral practitionersprimary healthcaresystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID36931699
PMCPMC10354392
OpenAlexW4327811831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.