Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36931633›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2023

Measuring the patient safety culture at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC).

Fasih Ali Ahmed, Fozia Asif, Tahir Munir, Muhammad Sohail Halim, Zehra Feroze Ali, Asim Belgaumi, Hasnain Zafar, Asad Latif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Revisiting hospital patient safety culture in China: a nationwide network analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fasih Ali AhmedDivision of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-5237
Fozia AsifCenter for Patient Safety, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Tahir MunirDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohail HalimSpencer Center for Vision Research, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Zehra Feroze AliQuality and Patient Safety Department, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Asim BelgaumiQuality and Patient Safety Department, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hasnain ZafarDepartment of Surgery, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Asad LatifDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan asad.latif@aku.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety is a top priority for many healthcare organisations worldwide. However, most of the initiatives aimed at the measurement and improvement of patient safety culture have been undertaken in developed countries. The purpose of this study was to measure the patient safety culture at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC).

methodsThe HSOPSC was used to measure the patient safety culture across 12 dimensions at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. 2,959 individuals, who had been working at the hospital, were administered the HSOPSC in paper form between June and September 2019.

resultsThe response rate of the survey was 50%. In the past 12 months, 979 respondents (33.1%) had submitted at least one event report. Results showed that the personnel viewed the patient safety culture at their hospital favourably. Overall, respondents scored highest in the following dimensions: 'feedback and communication on error' (91%), 'organisational learning and continuous improvement' (85%), 'teamwork within units' (83%), 'teamwork across units' (76%). The dimensions with the lowest positive per cent scores included 'staffing' (40%) and 'non-punitive response to error' (41%). Only the reliability of the 'handoffs and transitions', 'frequency of events reported', 'organisational learning' and 'teamwork within units' was higher than Cronbach's alpha of 0.7. Upon regression analysis of positive responses, physicians and nurses were found to have responded less favourably than the remaining professional groups for most dimensions.

conclusionThe measurement of safety culture is both feasible and informative in developing countries and could be broadly implemented to inform patient safety efforts. Current data suggest that it compares favourably with benchmarks from hospitals in the USA. Like the USA, high staff workload is a significant safety concern among staff. This study lays the foundation for further context-specific research on patient safety culture in developing countries.

Indexed as

Patient SafetySafety ManagementHumansPakistanReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care Centerspatient safetyquality improvementsafety culture

Identifiers

PMID36931633
PMCPMC10030877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.