Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36931572›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

Initial Feasibility and Acute Toxicity Outcomes From a Phase 2 Trial of

Steven G Allen, Benjamin S Rosen, Madhava Aryal, Yue Cao, Matthew J Schipper, Ka Kit Wong, Keith A Casper, Steven B Chinn, Kelly M Malloy, Mark E Prince and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven G AllenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Benjamin S RosenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Madhava AryalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yue CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Matthew J SchipperDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ka Kit WongDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Keith A CasperDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Steven B ChinnDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kelly M MalloyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mark E PrinceDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Andrew J RoskoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Andrew G ShumanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Surgery Services-ENT Section, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Matthew E SpectorDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Chaz L StuckenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Paul L SwiecickiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Francis P WordenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Chad BrennerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Caitlin A SchonewolfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
David A ElliottRadiation Oncology Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Michelle L MierzwaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jennifer L ShahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Radiation Oncology Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: jenlobo@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

Quantitative MRI models of HN Cancers for Physiological Adaption of RTU01CA183848 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CAO, YUE · 2014 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA183848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMETHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a planned interim initial feasibility and acute toxicity report from a phase 2, prospective, nonrandomized study, which enrolled patients with stage I-II p16+ OPSCC. All patients started definitive CRT to 70 Gy in 35 fractions, and those who met de-escalation criteria on midtreatment FDG-PET at fraction 10 completed treatment at 54 Gy in 27 fractions. We report the acute toxicity and patient-reported outcomes for 59 patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences between baseline patient characteristics in the standard and de-escalated cohorts. There were 28 of 59 (47.5%) patients who met FDG-PET de-escalation criteria and collectively received 20% to 30% less dose to critical organs at risk known to affect toxicity. At 3 months posttreatment, patients who received de-escalated CRT lost significantly less weight (median, 5.8% vs 13.0%; P < .001), had significantly less change from baseline in penetration-aspiration scale score (median, 0 vs 1; P = .018), and had significantly fewer aspiration events on repeat swallow study (8.0% vs 33.3%, P = .037) compared with patients receiving standard CRT.

conclusionsApproximately half of patients with early-stage p16+ OPSCC are selected for de-escalation of definitive CRT using midtreatment FDG-PET biomarkers, which resulted in significantly improved rates of observed acute toxicity. Further follow-up is ongoing and will be required to determine whether this de-escalation approach preserves the favorable oncologic outcomes for patients with p16+ OPSCC before adoption.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyFeasibility StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID36931572
PMCPMC12273592
OpenAlexW4324333886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.