Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36931360›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2023

Can Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Measures Estimate High Impact Chronic Pain After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Steven Z George, Dana Rubenstein, Michael P Bolognesi, Maggie E Horn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steven Z GeorgeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Dana RubensteinClinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael P BolognesiDivision of Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Maggie E HornDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Biopsychosocial Influence on Shoulder PainR01AR055899 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GEORGE, STEVEN Z · 2008 to 2020
$5.5M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002555 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002555NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh impact chronic pain (HICP) is not typically measured following orthopedic surgeries, but has a substantial negative impact on postoperative quality of life. This analysis determined which Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures accurately estimate HICP status following total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of a hip and knee TJA cohort. HICP status was determined by two items from the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised. The cohort (n = 2,400) consisted of 47.5% hip (n = 1,142) and 52.5% knee TJA (n = 1,258). For total hip arthroplasty (THA), 53.7% were women (n = 615), 48.6% were 65 years or older (n = 557), 72.5% completed the survey more than 24 months after first surgery (n = 831), and 9.9% had HICP (n = 114). For total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 54.3% were women (n = 687), 59.3% were 65 years or older (n = 750), 72.3% survey completed the survey more than 24 months after first surgery (n = 915), and 11.5% had HICP (n = 145). Included PROMIS measures were pain interference, physical function, anxiety, and sleep disturbance. First, discriminant function analysis determined PROMIS measure contribution to HICP status. Then, area under the curve (AUC) calculated the accuracy of PROMIS measures to estimate HICP status. Influences of sociodemographic and surgical characteristics on AUC were explored in sensitivity analyses.

resultsResults for TKA and THA were similar so they are presented collectively for the sake of brevity. Mean differences were identified for all PROMIS measures for those with HICP (All P values < 0.01). Pain interference (β = 0.934) and sleep disturbance (β = 0.154) were independently correlated with HICP status in discriminant function analyses. The AUC (95% CIs) for HICP were as follows: pain interference (.952-.973), physical function (.921-.949), sleep (.780-.838), and anxiety (.687-.757). Sensitivity analyses revealed little change in AUC and HICP cutoff scores for PROMIS pain interference and physical function.

conclusionTwo PROMIS measures commonly administered as standard of care for orthopedics, pain interference, and physical function, can be used to estimate HICP status for THA and TKA, thereby refining assessment of TJA outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChronic PainFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of Lifechronic painhealth-related quality of lifeoutcome measurespain interferencetotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36931360
PMCPMC10200752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.