Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36930789›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023

KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation rates, clinicopathological association, and their prognostic value in Iranian colorectal cancer patients.

Zohreh Mirzapoor Abbasabadi, Dariush Hamedi Asl, Babak Rahmani, Rozhin Shahbadori, Sara Karami, Amir Peymani, Sara Taghizadeh, Fatemeh Samiee Rad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular identification ofMolecular biology research communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the Therapeutic Potential ofCurrent drug discovery technologies · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zohreh Mirzapoor AbbasabadiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Dariush Hamedi AslDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Mehr Lab, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Hashtgerd, Iran.
Babak RahmaniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Rozhin ShahbadoriDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Mehr Lab, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Hashtgerd, Iran.
Sara KaramiDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Behsotun Lab, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Amir PeymaniMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Sara TaghizadehTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh Samiee RadMedical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Qazvin University of Medical Sciences · IRAlborz University of Medical SciencesJahrom University of Medical Sciences · IRFarabi Hospital · IR

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences 14003016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimMutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes are critical factors in clinical evaluation of colorectal cancer (CRC) development and progression. In Iran, however, the data regarding genetic profile of CRC patients is limited except for KRAS exon2 and BRAF V600F mutations. This study aimed to investigate the mutational spectrum and prognostic effects of these genes and explore the relationship between these mutations and clinicopathological features of CRC.

methodTo achieve these objectives, mutations in KRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4), NRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4), PIK3CA (exons 9 and 20), and BRAF (exon 15) was determined using PCR and pyrosequencing in a total of 151 patients with colorectal cancer.

resultsKRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations were identified in 41%, 5.96%, 3.97%, and 13.24% of the cases, respectively. There were some significant correlations between clinicopathological features and KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF, and NRAS mutations. Mutations in KRAS and PIK3CA were shown to be independent risk factors for poor survival of the patients at stage I-IV (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively). No significant impact on prognosis was observed in patients with BRAF mutations.

conclusionOur study revealed the prevalence of CRC biomarkers mutations in Iranian patients and emphasized the role of KRAS and PIK3CA on shorter overall survival rates in this population.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesColorectal NeoplasmsGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BRAFcolorectal cancerKRASNRASPIK3CA

Identifiers

PMID36930789
PMCPMC10098058
OpenAlexW4327697894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.