Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36930772›Full record

ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2023

Trends and Potential of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Drug Study at Single-Cell Level.

Ren Qi, Quan Zou

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ren QiYangtze Delta Region Institute (Quzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Quzhou 324000, China.
Quan ZouYangtze Delta Region Institute (Quzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Quzhou 324000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer treatments always face challenging problems, particularly drug resistance due to tumor cell heterogeneity. The existing datasets include the relationship between gene expression and drug sensitivities; however, the majority are based on tissue-level studies. Study drugs at the single-cell level are perspective to overcome minimal residual disease caused by subclonal resistant cancer cells retained after initial curative therapy. Fortunately, machine learning techniques can help us understand how different types of cells respond to different cancer drugs from the perspective of single-cell gene expression. Good modeling using single-cell data and drug response information will not only improve machine learning for cell-drug outcome prediction but also facilitate the discovery of drugs for specific cancer subgroups and specific cancer treatments. In this paper, we review machine learning and deep learning approaches in drug research. By analyzing the application of these methods on cancer cell lines and single-cell data and comparing the technical gap between single-cell sequencing data analysis and single-cell drug sensitivity analysis, we hope to explore the trends and potential of drug research at the single-cell data level and provide more inspiration for drug research at the single-cell level. We anticipate that this review will stimulate the innovative use of machine learning methods to address new challenges in precision medicine more broadly.

Identifiers

PMID36930772
PMCPMC10013796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
identifiers read64
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.