ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023
Semi-Self-Supervised Learning for Semantic Segmentation in Images with Dense Patterns.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leaf Analyzer: A fully automated and open-source tool for high-throughput leaf trait measurement.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- DU-Net-L: an effective and lightweight segmentation model for alfalfa images that integrates the strengths of DeepLabV3+ and U-Net.aBIOTECH · 2025Article
- The Global Wheat Full Semantic Organ Segmentation (GWFSS) dataset.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- AI-driven advances in plant biotechnology: sharpening the edge of plant tissue culture and genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Contrastive Learning vs. Self-Learning vs. Deformable Data Augmentation in Semantic Segmentation of Medical Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Efficient Wheat Head Segmentation with Minimal Annotation: A Generative Approach.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning has shown potential in domains with large-scale annotated datasets. However, manual annotation is expensive, time-consuming, and tedious. Pixel-level annotations are particularly costly for semantic segmentation in images with dense irregular patterns of object instances, such as in plant images. In this work, we propose a method for developing high-performing deep learning models for semantic segmentation of such images utilizing little manual annotation. As a use case, we focus on wheat head segmentation. We synthesize a computationally annotated dataset-using a few annotated images, a short unannotated video clip of a wheat field, and several video clips with no wheat-to train a customized U-Net model. Considering the distribution shift between the synthesized and real images, we apply three domain adaptation steps to gradually bridge the domain gap. Only using two annotated images, we achieved a Dice score of 0.89 on the internal test set. When further evaluated on a diverse external dataset collected from 18 different domains across five countries, this model achieved a Dice score of 0.73. To expose the model to images from different growth stages and environmental conditions, we incorporated two annotated images from each of the 18 domains to further fine-tune the model. This increased the Dice score to 0.91. The result highlights the utility of the proposed approach in the absence of large-annotated datasets. Although our use case is wheat head segmentation, the proposed approach can be extended to other segmentation tasks with similar characteristics of irregularly repeating patterns of object instances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.