Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36930620›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Assessing suicidality during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Lessons learned from adaptation and implementation of a telephone-based suicide risk assessment and response protocol in Malawi.

Kelsey R Landrum, Christopher F Akiba, Brian W Pence, Harriet Akello, Hamis Chikalimba, Josée M Dussault, Mina C Hosseinipour, Kingsley Kanzoole, Kazione Kulisewa, Jullita Kenala Malava and 3 more

Open access · goldFull text readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A Nation of Disasters: Lessons on Systemic Risks and Cascading Impacts From Malawi's COVID-19 Experience.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelsey R LandrumDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9870-8271
Christopher F AkibaDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Brian W PenceDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Harriet AkelloUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Hamis ChikalimbaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Josée M DussaultDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7434-2159
Mina C HosseinipourUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kingsley KanzooleAbwenzi Paza Umoyo/Partners in Health, Neno, Malawi.
Kazione KulisewaDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Kamuzu University of Health, Blantyre, Malawi.
Jullita Kenala MalavaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Michael UdediNoncommunicable Disease and Mental Health Unit, Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Chifundo C ZimbaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Bradley N GaynesDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USKamuzu Central Hospital · MWMinistry of Health · MWPublic Health Institute of Malawi · MW

Funding

Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Partnership (SHARP) for Mental Health Capacity Building - Scale-Up ComponentU19MH113202 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HOSSEINIPOUR, MINA CHRISTINE, PENCE, BRIAN W · 2017 to 2021
$4.1M
Training in Infectious Disease Epidemiology (TIDE)T32AI070114 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Brian W Pence · 2007 to 2026
$4.0M
Malawian Program for Mental Health Research Training (WARMHEART)D43TW011794 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRADLEY N GAYNES, Kazione Radson Kulisewa · 2020 to 2026
$1.8M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011794NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI070114NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH113202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to the rapid transition of many research studies from in-person to telephone follow-up globally. For mental health research in low-income settings, tele-follow-up raises unique safety concerns due to the potential of identifying suicide risk in participants who cannot be immediately referred to in-person care. We developed and iteratively adapted a telephone-delivered protocol designed to follow a positive suicide risk assessment (SRA) screening. We describe the development and implementation of this SRA protocol during follow-up of a cohort of adults with depression in Malawi enrolled in the Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Partnership for Mental Health Capacity Building (SHARP) randomized control trial during the COVID-19 era. We assess protocol feasibility and performance, describe challenges and lessons learned during protocol development, and discuss how this protocol may function as a model for use in other settings. Transition from in-person to telephone SRAs was feasible and identified participants with suicidal ideation (SI). Follow-up protocol monitoring indicated a 100% resolution rate of SI in cases following the SRA during this period, indicating that this was an effective strategy for monitoring SI virtually. Over 2% of participants monitored by phone screened positive for SI in the first six months of protocol implementation. Most were passive risk (73%). There were no suicides or suicide attempts during the study period. Barriers to implementation included use of a contact person for participants without personal phones, intermittent network problems, and pre-paid phone plans delaying follow-up. Delays in follow-up due to challenges with reaching contact persons, intermittent network problems, and pre-paid phone plans should be considered in future adaptations. Future directions include validation studies for use of this protocol in its existing context. This protocol was successful at identifying suicide risk levels and providing research assistants and participants with structured follow-up and referral plans. The protocol can serve as a model for virtual SRA development and is currently being adapted for use in other contexts.

Indexed as

COVID-19SuicideAdultHumansMalawiPandemicsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2Suicidal IdeationTelephone

Identifiers

PMID36930620
PMCPMC10022777
OpenAlexW4327675358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
identifiers read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.