Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36930616›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

E-health psychological intervention in pregnant women exposed to intimate partner violence (eIPV): A protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Antonella Ludmila Zapata-Calvente, Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras, Aurora Bueno Cavanillas, Karen Andreasen, Vibeke Rasch, Khalid S Khan

Open access · goldFull text readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonella Ludmila Zapata-CalventeBrain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-5485
Stella Martín-de-Las-HerasDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1554-951X
Aurora Bueno CavanillasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Karen AndreasenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Vibeke RaschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Khalid S KhanDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-7312
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy, a condition as common as obstetrics conditions like gestational diabetes, is associated with maternal and neonatal complications. Systematic detection of IPV is not well established in antenatal screening probably because the effectiveness of protective interventions has not been evaluated. E-health interventions may be beneficial among mothers exposed to IPV. Prior to performing a full-scale effectiveness trial for such an intervention, a pilot study is required to assess the feasibility of randomising a sufficiently large number of women exposed to IPV during pregnancy. The eIPV trial is a randomised pilot study nested within a cohort of consenting mothers who screen positive for IPV in the first antenatal visit at <12 weeks' gestation and accept an e-health package (psychological counselling by videoconference) in Spain and Denmark. Twenty eligible mothers from the above cohort will be randomised to either intervention or control. The intervention group will receive the e-health package as part of the cohort. The control group will be invited to accept a delay in the intervention (e-health package eight weeks later). After consenting to delay, the control group will provide comparative data without losing the opportunity of obtaining the intervention. We will determine estimates of rates of informed consent to randomization, and the rates of adherence and dropout following randomization. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to examine the women's perception about the benefit of the intervention, reasons for acceptability and non-adherence, and obstacles to recruitment, randomisation and consent. The results will inform the trial feasibility and variance of key clinical outcome measures for estimation of sample size of the full-scale effectiveness trial.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceTelemedicineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnant PeoplePsychosocial InterventionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID36930616
PMCPMC10022801
OpenAlexW4327681335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
identifiers read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.