ArticleBiotechnology letters2023
CRISPR/Cas9-assisted ssDNA recombineering for site-directed mutagenesis and saturation mutagenesis of plasmid-encoded genes.
Article in Biotechnology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coselection of BAC for Escherichia coli chromosomal DNA multiplex automated genome engineering.Biotechnology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Site-directed and saturation mutagenesis are critical DNA methodologies for studying protein structure and function. For plasmid-based gene mutation, PCR and overlap-extension PCR involve tedious cloning steps. When the plasmid size is large, PCR yield may be too low for cloning; and for saturation mutagenesis of a single codon, one experiment may not enough to generate all twenty coding variants. Oligo-mediated recombineering sidesteps the complicated cloning process by homologous recombination between a mutagenic oligo and its target site. However, the low recombineering efficiency and inability to select for the recombinant makes it necessary to screen a large number of clones. Herein, we describe two plasmid-based mutagenic strategies: CRISPR/Cas9-assisted ssDNA recombineering for site-directed mutagenesis (CRM) and saturation mutagenesis (CRSM). CRM and CRSM involve co-electroporation of target plasmid, sgRNA expression plasmid and mutagenic oligonucleotide into Escherichia coli cells with induced expression of λ-Red recombinase and Cas9, followed by plasmid extraction and characterization. We established CRM and CRSM via ampicillin resistance gene repair and mutagenesis of N-acetyl‑D‑neuraminic acid aldolase. The mutational efficiency was between 80 and 100% and all twenty amino acid coding variants were obtained at a target site via a single CRSM strategy. CRM and CRSM have the potential to be general plasmid-based gene mutagenesis tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.