ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in medical staff: trends during the 2009-2019 period in a multicentric study.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Occupational Protection in Interventional Radiology. A Joint Guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Guideline
- Comparison of clinical efficacy of robot-assisted and freehand core decompression in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Radiation Safety Knowledge, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Practices Among Healthcare Workers in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fabrication of medical radiation shielding sheets using reactive densification-based tungsten/PE porous composite materials.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of 3D-Printable Lead-Free Composite Materials for Mixed Photon and Neutron Attenuation.Polymers · 2026Article
- Beyond radiation dosimetry: metabolic burden and a possible healthy worker survivor pattern in the medical imaging workforce.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Chest Equivalent Dose as a Symbolic Radiation Communication Tool: Leadership Implications for Nurses' Knowledge, Anxiety, and Risk Attribution.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
- Evaluation of an Autonomous Robotic System for Reducing Radiation Risk in a Real-World Cardiac Imaging Laboratory.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Radiation protection: safety measures and knowledge among interventional radiologists- a UK-based analysis of current practices and recommendations for improvement.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Routine X-Rays After Central Venous Catheter Removal: A Value-Based Analysis of Post-Removal Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of radiation knowledge among medical personnel in nuclear emergency preparedness: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Foreign Contaminants Target Brain Health.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Association between occupational ionizing radiation exposure duration and the increased risk of dyslipidemia: evidence from a large group of radiation workers.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a French job-exposure matrix for healthcare workers: JEM Soignances.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024Article
- 'TLDetect': AI-Based Application for Detection and Correction of Anomalous TLD Glow Curves.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Occupational radiation exposure among medical personnel in university and general hospitals in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- 8-OxodG: A Potential Biomarker for Chronic Oxidative Stress Induced by High-LET Radiation.DNA · 2024Article
- [Detection of ionizing radiation in operating room and hospital areas].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024Article
- Joint EURADOS-EANM initiative for an advanced computational framework for the assessment of external dose rates from nuclear medicine patients.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHealth workers exposed to ionizing radiation account for + 50% of workers exposed to man-made radiation in France. Over the last decade, the use of radiation in medicine has increased due to the introduction of new practices. The EXposition des Professionnels de santE aux RayonnemenTs ioniSants study aims to evaluate and characterize the trends in radiation exposure of health workers in France between 2009 and 2019.
methodsThis retrospective study includes all health workers with at least one dosimetric record in the system for occupational dosimetry registration (Système d'information de la surveillance de l'exposition aux rayonnements ionisants) database for each of the years 2009, 2014, and 2019, in the hospitals included in the study. Individual external doses and socio-professional data were collected. Statistical analyses include descriptions, graphs, and logistic regressions.
resultsA total of 1457 workers were included (mean age: 39.8 years, 59% women). The average exposure significantly decreased between 2009 and 2019 (-0.008 mSv/year, p < 0.05). There were large discrepancies in trends according to professions, departments, hospitals, and gender. Over the 10-year study period, radiologic technologists and physicians were the most exposed (0.15 mSv (95%CI 0.14-0.16) and 0.13 mSv (0.06-0.21), respectively), but their exposure tended to decrease. Workers in nuclear medicine departments had the highest radiation exposure (0.36 mSv (0.33-0.39)), which remained stable over time. Thirty-eight percent of recorded doses were nonzero in 2009, decreasing to 20% in 2019.
conclusionsThis study allowed to identify physicians and radiologic technologists in nuclear medicine departments as the most exposed medical workers in France, and to show an overall decrease trend in radiation exposure. This should be instructive for radiation monitoring and safety of exposed medical workers. KEY POINTS: • Radiation exposure of healthcare workers in most medical departments has steadily decreased between 2009 and 2019 in several French hospitals. • The number of zero doses consistently increased during the study period. • Workers in nuclear medicine departments are the most exposed, especially radiologic technologists and physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.