Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929917›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

An expectation-maximization framework for comprehensive prediction of isoform-specific functions.

Guy Karlebach, Leigh Carmody, Jagadish Chandrabose Sundaramurthi, Elena Casiraghi, Peter Hansen, Justin Reese, Christopher J Mungall, Giorgio Valentini, Peter N Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ProteoformDB: an integrative database for functional roles of proteoforms.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Modelling Hurdle in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guy KarlebachThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1653-8206
Leigh CarmodyThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032, United States.
Jagadish Chandrabose SundaramurthiThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032, United States.
Elena CasiraghiAnacletoLab, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2024-7572
Peter HansenThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032, United States.
Justin ReeseDivision of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94710, United States.
Christopher J MungallDivision of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94710, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-2165
Giorgio ValentiniAnacletoLab, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-3919
Peter N RobinsonThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0736-9199
Jackson Laboratory · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAdvances in RNA sequencing technologies have achieved an unprecedented accuracy in the quantification of mRNA isoforms, but our knowledge of isoform-specific functions has lagged behind. There is a need to understand the functional consequences of differential splicing, which could be supported by the generation of accurate and comprehensive isoform-specific gene ontology annotations.

resultsWe present isoform interpretation, a method that uses expectation-maximization to infer isoform-specific functions based on the relationship between sequence and functional isoform similarity. We predicted isoform-specific functional annotations for 85 617 isoforms of 17 900 protein-coding human genes spanning a range of 17 430 distinct gene ontology terms. Comparison with a gold-standard corpus of manually annotated human isoform functions showed that isoform interpretation significantly outperforms state-of-the-art competing methods. We provide experimental evidence that functionally related isoforms predicted by isoform interpretation show a higher degree of domain sharing and expression correlation than functionally related genes. We also show that isoform sequence similarity correlates better with inferred isoform function than with gene-level function. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code, documentation, and resource files are freely available under a GNU3 license at https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/isopretEM and https://zenodo.org/record/7594321.

Indexed as

MotivationSoftwareAlternative SplicingHumansProtein IsoformsSequence Analysis, RNAProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID36929917
PMCPMC10079350
OpenAlexW4327683133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.