Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929814›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Assignment of molecular origins of NOE signal at -3.5 ppm in the brain.

Yu Zhao, Casey Sun, Zhongliang Zu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Vivo Brain BNMR in biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Early-stage mapping of macromolecular content in APPFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yu ZhaoVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2814-591X
Casey SunVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-4540
Zhongliang ZuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-7480
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) MR imaging of choline phospholipids and their metabolismR01EB029443 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Validation of CEST MR Imaging of Creatine and Phosphocreatine in MuscleR21AR074261 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2018 to 2019
$382k
Optimizing Glutamate Imaging using CEST MRI at 3T Clinical ScannersR03EB029078 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2020 to 2021
$170k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR074261NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029443NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB029078NIH HHS AR074261NIH HHS EB029078NIH HHS EB029443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNuclear Overhauser enhancemen mediated saturation transfer effect, termed NOE (-3.5 ppm), is a major source of CEST MRI contrasts at 3.5 ppm in the brain. Previous phantom experiments have demonstrated that both proteins and lipids, two major components in tissues, have substantial contributions to NOE (-3.5 ppm) signals. Their relative contributions in tissues are informative for the interpretation of NOE (-3.5 ppm) contrasts that could provide potential imaging biomarkers for relevant diseases, which remain incompletely understood.

methodsExperiments on homogenates and supernatants of brain tissues collected from healthy rats, that could isolate proteins from lipids, were performed to evaluate the relative contribution of lipids to NOE (-3.5 ppm) signals. On the other hand, experiments on ghost membranes with varied pH, and reconstituted phospholipids with different chemical compositions were conducted to study the dependence of NOE (-3.5 ppm) on physiological conditions. Besides, CEST imaging on rat brains bearing 9 L tumors and healthy rat brains was performed to analyze the causes of the NOE (-3.5 ppm) contrast variations between tumors and normal tissues, and between gray matter and white matter.

resultsOur experiments reveal that lipids have dominant contributions to the NOE (-3.5 ppm) signals. Further analysis suggests that decreased NOE (-3.5 ppm) signals in tumors and higher NOE (-3.5 ppm) signals in white matter than in gray matter are mainly explained by changes in membrane lipids, rather than proteins.

conclusionNOE (-3.5 ppm) could be exploited as a highly sensitive MRI contrast for imaging membrane lipids in the brain.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsAlgorithmsAnimalsBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingMembrane LipidsProtonsRatsMembrane LipidsProtonschemical exchange saturation transferlipidsmagnetization transfernuclear Overhauser enhancementtumor

Identifiers

PMID36929814
PMCPMC10644915
OpenAlexW4327683114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.