Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929578›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gynecologic oncology2023

Effects of a fertility-sparing re-treatment for recurrent atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: a systematic literature review.

Isao Murakami, Hiroko Machida, Tohru Morisada, Yasuhisa Terao, Tsutomu Tabata, Mikio Mikami, Yasuyuki Hirashima, Yoichi Kobayashi, Tsukasa Baba, Satoru Nagase

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Isao Murakami *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. isao.murakami@med.toho-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-3315
Hiroko Machida *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2252-3577
Tohru MorisadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4223-1291
Yasuhisa TeraoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9126-3361
Tsutomu TabataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-8180
Mikio MikamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-3518
Yasuyuki HirashimaDivision of Gynecology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0269-9313
Yoichi KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-0625
Tsukasa BabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0066-3747
Satoru NagaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5212-1128
Kyorin University · JPTokai University · JPIwate Medical University · JPJuntendo University · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPToho University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effectiveness of progestin re-treatment for recurrent endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH) and endometrial cancer (EC) following initial fertility-sparing treatment.

methodsA comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by an Expert Panel of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Endometrial Cancer Committee. Multiple search engines, including PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database, were searched in December 2021 using the keywords "Endometrial neoplasms," "Endometrial hyperplasia," "Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia," "Fertility preservation," "Progestins," AND "Recurrence." Cases describing progestin re-treatment for recurrent EIN, AH and EC were compared with cases that underwent conventional hysterectomy. The primary outcomes were survival and disease recurrence, and the secondary outcome was pregnancy.

resultsAfter screening 238 studies, 32 with results for recurrent treatment were identified. These studies included 365 patients (270 received progestin re-treatment and 95 underwent hysterectomy). Most progestin re-treatment involved medroxyprogesterone acetate or megestrol acetate (94.5%). Complete remission (CR) following progestin re-treatment was achieved in 219 (81.1%) cases, with 3-, 6- and 9-month cumulative CR rates of 22.8%, 51.7% and 82.6%, respectively. Progestin re-treatment was associated with higher risk of disease recurrence than conventional hysterectomy was (odds ratio [OR]=6.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.99-23.10), and one patient (0.4%) died of disease. Fifty-one (14.0%) women became pregnant after recurrence, and progestin re-treatment demonstrated a possibility of pregnancy (OR=2.48; 95% CI=0.94-6.58).

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that repeat progestin therapy is an effective option for women with recurrent EIN, AH and EC, who wish to retain their fertility.

Indexed as

Endometrial HyperplasiaEndometrial NeoplasmsFertility PreservationFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPregnancyProgestinsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeProgestinsEndometrial HyperplasiaEndometrial NeoplasmFertility PreservationProgestinsRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36929578
PMCPMC10323306
OpenAlexW4324117749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.