ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
MS-Net: Learning to assess the malignant status of a lung nodule by a radiologist and her peers.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MS-Net: Learning to assess the malignant status of a lung nodule by a radiologist and her peers.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutomatically assessing the malignant status of lung nodules based on CTscan images can help reduce the workload of radiologists while improving their diagnostic accuracy. PURPOSE: Despite remarkable progress in the automatic diagnosis of pulmonary nodules by deep learning technologies, two significant problems remain outstanding. First, end-to-end deep learning solutions tend to neglect the empirical (semantic) features accumulated by radiologists and only rely on automatic features discovered by neural networks to provide the final diagnostic results, leading to questionable reliability, and interpretability. Second, inconsistent diagnosis between radiologists, a widely acknowledged phenomenon in clinical settings, is rarely examined and quantitatively explored by existing machine learning approaches. This paper solves these problems.
methodsWe propose a novel deep neural network called MS-Net, which comprises two sequential modules: A feature derivation and initial diagnosis module (FDID), followed by a diagnosis refinement module (DR). Specifically, to take advantage of accumulated empirical features and discovered automatic features, the FDID model of MS-Net first derives a range of perceptible features and provides two initial diagnoses for lung nodules; then, these results are fed to the subsequent DR module to refine the diagnoses further. In addition, to fully consider the individual and panel diagnosis opinions, we propose a new loss function called collaborative loss, which can collaboratively optimize the individual and her peers' opinions to provide a more accurate diagnosis.
resultsWe evaluate the performance of the proposed MS-Net on the Lung Image Database Consortium image collection (LIDC-IDRI). It achieves 92.4% of accuracy, 92.9% of sensitivity, and 92.0% of specificity when panel labels are the ground truth, which is superior to other state-of-the-art diagnosis models. As a byproduct, the MS-Net can automatically derive a range of semantic features of lung nodules, increasing the interpretability of the final diagnoses.
conclusionsThe proposed MS-Net can provide an automatic and accurate diagnosis of lung nodules, meeting the need for a reliable computer-aided diagnosis system in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.