Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929479›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2023

Induction of fetal meiotic oocytes from embryonic stem cells in cynomolgus monkeys.

Sayuri Gyobu-Motani, Yukihiro Yabuta, Ken Mizuta, Yoshitaka Katou, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Masanori Kawasaki, Ayaka Kitamura, Tomoyuki Tsukiyama, Chizuru Iwatani, Hideaki Tsuchiya and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mechanisms of human germ cell development.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. In Vitro Growth of Mammalian Follicles and Oocytes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Generation of mouse and rat xenogeneic ovariesAnimal cells and systems · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sayuri Gyobu-MotaniInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-1335
Yukihiro YabutaInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ken MizutaInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3922-1009
Yoshitaka KatouInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ikuhiro OkamotoInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2870-8321
Masanori KawasakiInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8090-8558
Ayaka KitamuraInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomoyuki TsukiyamaInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2657-7719
Chizuru IwataniResearch Center for Animal Life Science, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Hideaki TsuchiyaResearch Center for Animal Life Science, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Taro TsujimuraInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuya YamamotoInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomonori NakamuraInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0173-0780
Mitinori SaitouInstitute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2895-6798
Kyoto University · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human in vitro oogenesis provides a framework for clarifying the mechanism of human oogenesis. To create its benchmark, it is vital to promote in vitro oogenesis using a model physiologically close to humans. Here, we establish a foundation for in vitro oogenesis in cynomolgus (cy) monkeys (Macaca fascicularis): cy female embryonic stem cells harboring one active and one inactive X chromosome (Xa and Xi, respectively) differentiate robustly into primordial germ cell-like cells, which in xenogeneic reconstituted ovaries develop efficiently into oogonia and, remarkably, further into meiotic oocytes at the zygotene stage. This differentiation entails comprehensive epigenetic reprogramming, including Xi reprogramming, yet Xa and Xi remain epigenetically asymmetric with, as partly observed in vivo, incomplete Xi reactivation. In humans and monkeys, the Xi epigenome in pluripotent stem cells functions as an Xi-reprogramming determinant. We further show that developmental pathway over-activations with suboptimal up-regulation of relevant meiotic genes impede in vitro meiotic progression. Cy in vitro oogenesis exhibits critical homology with the human system, including with respect to bottlenecks, providing a salient model for advancing human in vitro oogenesis.

Indexed as

OocytesOogenesisAnimalsEmbryonic Stem CellsFemaleHumansMacaca fascicularisOvaryepigenetic reprogrammingin vitro oogenesismeiotic prophaseprimatesX-chromosome reprogramming

Identifiers

PMID36929479
PMCPMC10152148
OpenAlexW4327547073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.