Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929471›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence.

Roberta Tutino, Casimiro Nigro, Flavia Paternostro, Rosa Federico, Giacomo Lo Secco, Gaetano Gallo, Mauro Santarelli, Gianfranco Cocorullo, Sebastiano Bonventre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roberta TutinoGeneral Surgery 3 O.U., Molinette Hospital, University Hospital Città Della Salute E Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy. rtutino@cittadellasalute.to.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-4689
Casimiro NigroDepartment of Surgery, Università Degli Studi Di Roma "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Flavia PaternostroMedical Oncology O.U., Università Campus Biomedico Di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Rosa FedericoUniversity Hospital "P. Giaccone" of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giacomo Lo SeccoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Gaetano GalloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mauro SantarelliGeneral Surgery 3 O.U., Molinette Hospital, University Hospital Città Della Salute E Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Gianfranco CocorulloDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Disciplines, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Sebastiano BonventreDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Disciplines, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. sebastiano.bonventre@unipa.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that have failed non-operative management is lateral internal sphincterotomy. Surgery can cause de novo incontinence. Fissurectomy has been proposed as a sphincter/saving procedure, especially in the presence of a deep posterior pouch with or without a crypt infection. This study investigated whether fissurectomy offers a benefit in terms of de novo post-operative incontinence.

methodsPatients surgically managed with fissurectomy or lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures from 2013 to 2019 have been included. Healing rate, changes in continence and patient satisfaction were investigated at long-term follow-up.

resultsOne hundred twenty patients (55 females, 65 males) were analysed: 29 patients underwent fissurectomy and 91 lateral internal sphincterotomy. Mean follow-up was 55 months [confidence interval (CI) 5-116 months]. Both techniques showed some rate of de novo post-operative incontinence (> +3 Vaizey score points): 8.9% lateral internal sphincterotomy, 17.8% fissurectomy (p = 0.338). The mean Vaizey score in these patients was 10.37 [standard deviation (sd) 6.3] after lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) and 5.4 (sd 2.3) after fissurectomy Healing rate was 97.8% in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group and 75.8% in the fissurectomy group (p = 0.001). In the lateral internal sphincterotomy group, patients with de novo post-op incontinence showed a statistically significant lower satisfaction rate (9.2 ± 1.57 versus 6.13 ± 3; p = 0.023) while no differences were present in the fissurectomy group (8.87 ± 1.69 versus 7.4 ± 1.14; p = 0.077).

conclusionsLateral internal sphincterotomy is confirmed as the preferred technique in term of healing rate. Fissurectomy did not offer a lower rate of de novo post-operative incontinence, but resulted in lower Vaizey scores in patients in whom this occurred. Satisfaction was lower in patients suffering a de novo post-operative incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceFissure in AnoLateral Internal SphincterotomyAnal CanalChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAnal canal/surgeryAnal fissureFaecal incontinenceFissurectomyLateral internal sphincterotomy

Identifiers

PMID36929471
PMCPMC10485083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.