Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929407›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).

William Ong Lay Keat, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Amelia Pietropaolo, Ben Hall Chew, Chu Ann Chai, Takaaki Inoue, Deepak Ragoori, Sarvajit Biligere, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Maria Pia Pavia and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

William Ong Lay KeatDepartment of Urology, Penang General Hospital, Penang, Malaysia.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Amelia PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Ben Hall ChewDepartment of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Chu Ann ChaiDepartment of Surgery, Urology Unit, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Takaaki InoueDepartment of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
Deepak RagooriDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Irram Manzil Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sarvajit BiligereDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrea Benedetto GalosiUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy.
Maria Pia PaviaUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy.
Giulio MilaneseUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy.
Thomas AhnDepartment of Urology, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.
Sumit MoreDepartment of Urology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Faridabad, India.
Kemal SaricaDepartment of Urology, Biruni University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-9190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones by comparing hard versus soft stones based on their attenuation on computed tomography (Hounsfield Units-HU).

methodsPatients were divided into two groups according to the type of laser employed [Holmium:YAG (HL) or Thulium fiber laser (TFL)]. Residual fragments (RF) were defined as > 2 mm. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with RF and RF needing further intervention.

results4208 patients from 20 centers were included. In whole series, age, recurrent stones, stone size, lower pole stones (LPS), and multiple stones were predictors of RF at multivariable analysis and LPS and stone size with RF requiring further treatment. HU and TFL were associated with lesser RF and RF requiring an additional treatment. In HU < 1000 stones, recurrent stones, stone size, and LPS were predictors of RF at multivariable analysis, whereas TFL was less likely associated with RF. Recurrent stones, stone size, and multiple stones were predictors of RF requiring further treatment, while LPS and TFL were associated with lesser RF requiring further treatment. In HU ≥ 1000 stones, age, stone size, multiple stones, and LPS were predictors of RF at multivariable analysis, while TFL was less likely associated with RF. Stone size and LPS were predictors of RF requiring further treatment, whereas TFL was associated with RF requiring further treatment.

conclusionStone size, LPS, and use of HL are predictors of RF after RIRS for intrarenal stones regardless of stone density. HU should be considered an important parameter in predicting SFR.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserHolmiumHumansLasersLipopolysaccharidesRegistriesThuliumTreatment OutcomeUreteroscopyHolmiumLipopolysaccharidesThuliumHounsfield unitKidney calculiLaserLithotripsyRetrograde intrarenal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.